The Unsuitability of Energy Expenditure Derived From Microtechnology for Assessing Internal Load in Collision-Based Activities.

This aim of this study was to examine the validity of energy expenditure derived from microtechnology when measured during a repeated-effort rugby protocol. Sixteen male rugby players completed a repeated-effort protocol comprising 3 sets of 6 collisions during which movement activity and energy expenditure (EE) were measured using microtechnology. In addition, energy expenditure was estimated from open-circuit spirometry (EE). While related (r = .63, 90%CI .08-.89), there was a systematic underestimation of energy expenditure during the protocol (-5.94 ± 0.67 kcal/min) for EE (7.2 ± 1.0 kcal/min) compared with EE (13.2 ± 2.3 kcal/min). High-speed-running distance (r = .50, 95%CI -.66 to .84) was related to EE, while PlayerLoad was not (r = .37, 95%CI -.81 to .68). While metabolic power might provide a different measure of external load than other typically used microtechnology metrics (eg, high-speed running, PlayerLoad), it underestimates energy expenditure during intermittent team sports that involve collisions.