School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QL, 4014, Australia.
School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, Australia.
Sports Med. 2021 Mar;51(3):549-565. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01399-1. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
Technology has long been used to track player movements in team sports, with initial tracking via manual coding of video footage. Since then, wearable microtechnology in the form of global and local positioning systems has provided a less labour-intensive way of monitoring movements. As such, there has been a proliferation in research pertaining to these devices.
A systematic review of studies that investigate the validity and/or reliability of wearable microtechnology to quantify movement and specific actions common to intermittent team sports.
A systematic search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus was performed; studies included must have been (1) original research investigations; (2) full-text articles written in English; (3) published in a peer-reviewed academic journal; and (4) assessed the validity and/or reliability of wearable microtechnology to quantify movements or specific actions common to intermittent team sports.
A total of 384 studies were retrieved and 187 were duplicates. The titles and abstracts of 197 studies were screened and the full texts of 88 manuscripts were assessed. A total of 62 studies met the inclusion criteria. Additional 10 studies, identified via reference list assessment, were included. Therefore, a total of 72 studies were included in this review.
There are many studies investigating the validity and reliability of wearable microtechnology to track movement and detect sport-specific actions. It is evident that for the majority of metrics, validity and reliability are multi-factorial, in that it is dependent upon a wide variety of factors including wearable technology brand and model, sampling rate, type of movement performed (e.g., straight line, change of direction) and intensity of movement (e.g., walk, sprint). Practitioners should be mindful of the accuracy and repeatability of the devices they are using when making decisions on player training loads.
长期以来,技术一直被用于跟踪团队运动中的球员动作,最初通过手动对视频片段进行编码来进行跟踪。从那时起,以全球定位系统和局部定位系统形式出现的可穿戴微技术为监测运动提供了一种劳动强度较低的方式。因此,与这些设备相关的研究大量涌现。
对研究可穿戴微技术来量化间歇性团队运动中常见的运动和特定动作的有效性和/或可靠性的研究进行系统综述。
对 CINAHL、MEDLINE 和 SPORTDiscus 进行了系统检索;必须包括(1)原始研究调查;(2)全文用英语撰写的文章;(3)发表在同行评议的学术期刊上;(4)评估可穿戴微技术来量化间歇性团队运动中常见的运动或特定动作的有效性和/或可靠性。
共检索到 384 项研究,其中 187 项为重复项。筛选了 197 项研究的标题和摘要,并评估了 88 篇手稿的全文。共有 62 项研究符合纳入标准。通过参考文献评估还确定了另外 10 项研究。因此,共有 72 项研究纳入本综述。
有许多研究调查了可穿戴微技术跟踪运动和检测特定运动动作的有效性和可靠性。很明显,对于大多数指标,有效性和可靠性都是多因素的,因为它取决于多种因素,包括可穿戴技术品牌和型号、采样率、执行的运动类型(例如直线运动、变向运动)和运动强度(例如步行、冲刺)。当决策者决定球员的训练负荷时,应注意他们所使用设备的准确性和可重复性。