Rosenthal Meagen M, Molzahn Anita E, Chan Christopher T, Cockfield Sandra L, Kim S Joseph, Pauly Robert P
Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USA.
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2016 May 18;6(5):e011951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951.
The objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).
A grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.
Participants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.
The study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.
A constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.
In this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of 'why take a chance when things are going well?' was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including 'negative past experience', 'feeling well on NHD', 'gaining autonomy' and 'responsibility'.
This study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.
本研究的目的是探讨影响患者做出放弃移植而选择继续接受夜间血液透析(NHD)这一决策的因素。
采用基于深入电话访谈的扎根理论方法。
研究对象来自加拿大的两个三级护理肾脏项目。
研究参与者为符合条件的终末期肾病患者,他们选择不进入移植名单。共访谈了7名符合条件的参与者,其中5名男性,平均年龄为46岁。
采用持续比较分析法来确定核心类别以及影响决策过程的因素。
在这项针对接受NHD且拒绝肾脏移植患者的扎根理论研究中,确定了“情况顺利时为何要冒险?”这一核心类别,以及影响决策的4个因素,包括“过去的负面经历”“NHD时感觉良好”“获得自主权”和“责任感”。
本研究深入了解了患者围绕一项重要治疗决策的思维过程。这些见解可能有助于肾脏治疗团队在以患者为中心的护理模式中更好地理解并因此尊重患者的选择。研究结果也可能有助于制定针对这类患者特定担忧的教育项目。