School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Clinical Psychology Dept, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Rhyl, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 10;13(8):e071348. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071348.
To synthesise qualitative research exploring patients' perspectives, experiences and factors influencing their decision-making preferences when choosing or declining kidney transplantation.
A qualitative evidence synthesis.
Electronic databases were searched from 2000 to June 2021: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest Core Databases for Dissertations and Theses, and Google Scholar.
Qualitative studies exploring and reporting decision-making preferences of people with kidney disease, which reported influencing factors when choosing or declining kidney transplantation, published in English from high-income and middle-income countries.
Titles were screened against the inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis was done with the use of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist to assess study quality, and assessment of confidence in the qualitative findings was done using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research.
37 studies from 11 countries reported the perspectives of 1366 patients with kidney disease. Six descriptive themes were developed: decisional preferences influenced patients' readiness to pursue kidney transplantation, gathering sufficient information to support decision-making, navigating the kidney transplant assessment pathway, desire for kidney transplantation, opposed to kidney transplantation and uncertainties while waiting for the kidney transplant. A new enhanced theoretical model was developed to aid understanding of the complexities of decision-making in people with kidney disease, by integrating the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Adaptive Decision Maker Framework to incorporate the novel findings.
The synthesis provides a better understanding of the extremely complex decision-making processes of people with kidney disease, which are aligned to their kidney transplantation preferences. Further research is needed to better understand the reasons for declining kidney transplantation, and to underpin development of personalised information, interventions and support for patients to make informed decisions when presented with kidney replacement options.
CRD42021272588.
综合定性研究,探索患者在选择或拒绝肾移植时的观点、经验和影响其决策偏好的因素。
定性证据综合。
从 2000 年至 2021 年 6 月,电子数据库进行了检索:PubMed、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、Web of Science、ProQuest 核心学位论文数据库和 Google Scholar。
探索和报告肾病患者决策偏好的定性研究,报告选择或拒绝肾移植的影响因素,发表于高收入和中等收入国家的英文期刊。
根据纳入标准筛选标题。使用关键评估技巧方案定性清单进行主题综合,以评估研究质量,并使用推荐评估、发展和评估定性研究证据的信心分级对定性研究结果的信心进行评估。
来自 11 个国家的 37 项研究报告了 1366 名肾病患者的观点。制定了 6 个描述性主题:决策偏好影响患者接受肾移植的准备程度、收集足够的信息支持决策、在肾移植评估途径中导航、对肾移植的渴望、反对肾移植和等待肾移植时的不确定性。为了更好地理解肾病患者决策的复杂性,开发了一个新的增强理论模型,该模型通过整合计划行为理论和适应性决策者框架,纳入新的发现,来整合决策偏好。
该综合研究更好地理解了肾病患者极其复杂的决策过程,这些过程与他们的肾移植偏好一致。需要进一步研究以更好地了解拒绝肾移植的原因,并为患者提供个性化的信息、干预措施和支持,以便在提供肾脏替代选择时做出明智的决策。
CRD42021272588。