Morotti A, Romero J M, Jessel M J, Brouwers H B, Gupta R, Schwab K, Vashkevich A, Ayres A, Anderson C D, Gurol M E, Viswanathan A, Greenberg S M, Rosand J, Goldstein J N
From the Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences (A.M.), Neurology Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
J.P. Kistler Stroke Research Center (A.M., M.J.J., K.S., A. Vashkevich, A.A., C.D.A., M.E.G., A. Viswanathan, S.M.G., J.R., J.N.G.).
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Oct;37(10):1781-1786. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4810. Epub 2016 May 19.
Reduction of CT tube current is an effective strategy to minimize radiation load. However, tube current is also a major determinant of image quality. We investigated the impact of CTA tube current on spot sign detection and diagnostic performance for intracerebral hemorrhage expansion.
We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected cohort of consecutive patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage from January 2001 to April 2015 who underwent CTA. The study population was divided into 2 groups according to the median CTA tube current level: low current (<350 mA) and high current (≥350 mA). CTA first-pass readings for spot sign presence were independently analyzed by 2 readers. Baseline and follow-up hematoma volumes were assessed by semiautomated computer-assisted volumetric analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of spot sign in predicting hematoma expansion were calculated.
This study included 709 patients (288 and 421 in the low- and high-current groups, respectively). A higher proportion of low-current scans identified at least 1 spot sign (20.8% versus 14.7%, = .034), but hematoma expansion frequency was similar in the 2 groups (18.4% versus 16.2%, = .434). Sensitivity and positive and negative predictive values were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conversely, high-current scans showed superior specificity (91% versus 84%, = .015) and overall accuracy (84% versus 77%, = .038).
CTA obtained at high levels of tube current showed better diagnostic accuracy for prediction of hematoma expansion by using spot sign. These findings may have implications for future studies using the CTA spot sign to predict hematoma expansion for clinical trials.
降低CT管电流是使辐射负荷最小化的有效策略。然而,管电流也是图像质量的主要决定因素。我们研究了CT血管造影(CTA)管电流对脑出血扩大的斑点征检测及诊断性能的影响。
我们回顾性分析了2001年1月至2015年4月期间连续行CTA检查的原发性脑出血患者的前瞻性队列。根据CTA管电流水平中位数将研究人群分为两组:低电流组(<350 mA)和高电流组(≥350 mA)。两名阅片者独立分析CTA首次通过扫描的斑点征情况。通过半自动计算机辅助容积分析评估基线和随访时的血肿体积。计算斑点征预测血肿扩大的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性。
本研究纳入709例患者(低电流组288例,高电流组421例)。低电流扫描中发现至少1个斑点征的比例更高(20.8%对14.7%,P = 0.034),但两组血肿扩大频率相似(18.4%对16.2%,P = 0.434)。两组间敏感性、阳性和阴性预测值无显著差异。相反,高电流扫描显示出更高的特异性(91%对84%,P = 0.015)和总体准确性(84%对77%,P = 0.038)。
管电流较高时获得的CTA在利用斑点征预测血肿扩大方面显示出更好的诊断准确性。这些发现可能对未来使用CTA斑点征预测血肿扩大的临床试验研究具有启示意义。