Wells-Parker E, Anderson B J, McMillen D L, Landrum J W
Br J Addict. 1989 Apr;84(4):381-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb00581.x.
Using long-term DUI (Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol) arrest recidivism data from a controlled study of DUI intervention effectiveness, interactions among DUI interventions, age, race, education, and alcohol severity were estimated using logit analysis. Data were collected in a 9-year follow-up study of the Mississippi DUI Probation Project. The effects of short-term interventions (alcohol education schools for low alcohol severity offenders and structured group interventions for high alcohol severity offenders) were specified by educational level. Short-term rehabilitation was modestly effective for those with less than 12 years of education, but less effective or detrimental for the more highly educated. The effects of probation were specified by age and education, being more effective for those under 30 years and 55 years or older than for the middle age group. Probation was most effective for well-educated older (55+) offenders. An analysis of the under 30 years group also suggested that probation was especially effective for young well-educated Minority offenders.
利用一项关于酒驾干预效果的对照研究中的长期酒驾（酒后驾车）再犯数据，通过逻辑分析估计了酒驾干预措施、年龄、种族、教育程度和酒精严重程度之间的相互作用。数据收集于对密西西比州酒驾缓刑项目的一项为期9年的随访研究中。短期干预措施（针对酒精严重程度较低的罪犯的酒精教育学校和针对酒精严重程度较高的罪犯的结构化团体干预）的效果按教育水平进行了明确。短期康复对受教育年限少于12年的人有一定效果，但对受教育程度较高的人效果较差或有不利影响。缓刑的效果按年龄和教育程度进行了明确，对30岁以下和55岁及以上的人比对中年人群体更有效。缓刑对受过良好教育的年长（55岁以上）罪犯最有效。对30岁以下群体的分析还表明，缓刑对年轻的受过良好教育的少数族裔罪犯特别有效。
