Lutz F, Lüscher B, Ochsenbein H
SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1977 Aug;87(8):684-93.
In a dye penetration test and a scanning electron microscopic evaluation MOD-restorations made of a thixotropic material (ZKP-A-5(2)) and of two syringe system composites (Concise-Capsule-Composite3, Compocap-S4) were investigated with respect to microleakage and marginal adaptation. These materials did not reveal better marginal micromorphology than a comparable two-paste composite system (Concise3); Compocap-S showed markedly less microleakage. The quality of marginal adaptation, however, was improved to 52% when a low viscosity sealant (ZKP-A-2(2), Concise Enamel Bond3) was applied before insertion of the restorative. A sealant pretreatment is therefore compulsory in thixotropic and syringe packed composites as well. The perfection reached with these composite brands is equal to that of adhesive restorations made of Concise or Adaptic5 [6,7]. Restorations performed with new, complete composite systems (Nimetic6, GC's Epolite 100/Epobond7) revealed moderate results when compared to standard materials like Concise or Adaptic [6,7].
在一项染料渗透试验和扫描电子显微镜评估中，对由触变材料（ZKP-A-5(2)）以及两种注射式系统复合材料（Concise-Capsule-Composite3、Compocap-S4）制成的MOD修复体的微渗漏和边缘适应性进行了研究。与一种类似的双糊剂复合系统（Concise3）相比，这些材料并未显示出更好的边缘微观形态；Compocap-S显示出明显更少的微渗漏。然而，在修复体插入前应用低粘度密封剂（ZKP-A-2(2)、Concise Enamel Bond3）时，边缘适应性质量提高到了52%。因此，在触变和注射包装的复合材料中，密封剂预处理也是必不可少的。这些复合品牌所达到的完美程度与由Concise或Adaptic5制成的粘结修复体相当[6,7]。与Concise或Adaptic等标准材料相比，使用新型完整复合系统（Nimetic6、GC的Epolite 100/Epobond7）进行的修复显示出中等结果[6,7]。
