Lutz F, Lüscher B, Ochsenbein H
SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1977 Aug;87(8):752-63.
Microleakage and marginal adaptation of different composite brands (Epoxydent, Restodent, Cosmic) in conventional and adhesive MOD-cavities have been investigated in an in vitro dye-penetration and scanning electron microscope study. The results were compared to those of a standard composite brand (Adaptic). Unrelated to the type of cavity and enamel etching procedures Epoxydent and Restodent revealed moderate results only. When the use of a sealant was omitted prior to bulk placement Cosmic showed the best adaptation. Priming (Cosmic Bond) was found to impede microleakage but not to influence marginal adaptation. The superiority of the adhesive restorations that had been performed with the Adaptic and the Concise system [4] is a result of the combination of these composite materials with a sealant and the new cavity design.
在一项体外染料渗透和扫描电子显微镜研究中，已对不同复合树脂品牌（Epoxydent、Restodent、Cosmic）在传统和粘结性MOD洞型中的微渗漏及边缘适合性进行了调查。将结果与一种标准复合树脂品牌（Adaptic）的结果进行了比较。与洞型类型和釉质酸蚀程序无关，Epoxydent和Restodent仅显示出中等结果。当在大量充填前未使用封闭剂时，Cosmic显示出最佳适合性。发现底漆（Cosmic Bond）可阻止微渗漏，但不影响边缘适合性。使用Adaptic和Concise系统进行的粘结修复体的优越性是这些复合材料与封闭剂以及新洞型设计相结合的结果。
