Suppr超能文献

使用与在线数据库相连的手腕加速度计追踪全身强直阵挛性发作。

Tracking generalized tonic-clonic seizures with a wrist accelerometer linked to an online database.

作者信息

Velez Mariel, Fisher Robert S, Bartlett Victoria, Le Scheherazade

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Stanford Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, 213 Quarry Drive, 5979, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.

Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Seizure. 2016 Jul;39:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinical management of epilepsy and current epilepsy therapy trials rely on paper or electronic diaries often with inaccurate self-reported seizure frequency as the primary outcome. This is the first study addressing the feasibility of detecting and recording generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) through a biosensor linked to an online seizure database.

METHOD

A prospective trial was conducted with video-EEG (vEEG) in an epilepsy monitoring unit. Patients wore a wristwatch accelerometer that detected shaking and transmitted events via Bluetooth® to a bedside electronic tablet and then via Wi-Fi to an online portal. The watch recorded the date, time, audio, duration, frequency and amplitude of events. Events logged by the watch and recorded in a bedside paper diary were measured against vEEG, the "gold standard."

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled and 62 seizures were recorded on vEEG: 31 convulsive and 31 non-convulsive. Twelve patients had a total of 31 convulsive seizures, and of those, 10 patients had 13 GTCS. The watch captured 12/13 (92.3%) GTCS. Watch audio recordings were consistent with seizures in 11/12 (91.6%). Data were successfully transferred to the bedside tablet in 11/12 (91.6%), and to the online database in 10/12 (83.3%) GTCS. The watch recorded 81 false positives, of which 42/81 (51%) were cancelled by the patients. Patients and caregivers verbally reported 15/62 seizures (24.2% sensitivity) but no seizures were recorded on paper logs.

CONCLUSION

Automatic detection and recording of GTCS to an online database is feasible and may be more informative than seizure logging in a paper diary.

摘要

目的

癫痫的临床管理及当前的癫痫治疗试验通常依赖纸质或电子日记,而自我报告的癫痫发作频率往往不准确,这是主要的观察指标。这是第一项探讨通过与在线癫痫发作数据库相连的生物传感器检测和记录全身强直阵挛性发作(GTCS)可行性的研究。

方法

在癫痫监测单元进行了一项视频脑电图(vEEG)前瞻性试验。患者佩戴一款可检测震动的腕部加速度计,通过蓝牙将事件传输至床边电子平板电脑,然后通过Wi-Fi传输至在线平台。该手表记录事件的日期、时间、音频、持续时间、频率和幅度。将手表记录并记录在床边纸质日记中的事件与“金标准”vEEG进行对照测量。

结果

招募了30名患者,vEEG记录到62次癫痫发作:31次惊厥性发作和31次非惊厥性发作。12名患者共有31次惊厥性发作,其中10名患者有13次GTCS。手表捕捉到了13次GTCS中的12次(92.3%)。手表音频记录与12次发作中的11次(91.6%)一致。12次GTCS中有11次(91.6%)的数据成功传输至床边平板电脑,10次(83.3%)成功传输至在线数据库。手表记录了81例假阳性事件,其中42/81(51%)被患者取消。患者和护理人员口头报告了62次发作中的15次(灵敏度为24.2%),但纸质日志中未记录任何发作。

结论

将GTCS自动检测并记录到在线数据库是可行的,可能比在纸质日记中记录癫痫发作更具信息价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验