Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Seizure. 2020 May;78:86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
A phase I feasibility study to determine the accuracy of identifying seizures based on audio recordings.
We systematically generated 166 audio clips of 30 s duration from 83 patients admitted to an epilepsy monitoring unit between 1/2015 and 12/2016, with one clip during a seizure period and one clip during a non-seizure control period for each patient. Five epileptologists performed a blinded review of the audio clips and rated whether a seizure occurred or not, and indicated the confidence level (low or high) of their rating. The accuracy of individual and consensus ratings were calculated.
The overall performance of the consensus rating between the five epileptologists showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.91 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.66. The performance improved when confidence was high (PPV of 0.96, NPV of 0.70). The agreement between the epileptologists was moderate with a kappa of 0.584. Hyperkinetic (PPV 0.92, NPV 0.86) and tonic-clonic (PPV and NPV 1.00) seizures were most accurately identified. Seizures with automatisms only and non-motor seizures could not be accurately identified. Specific seizure-related sounds associated with accurate identification included disordered breathing (PPV and NPV 1.00), rhythmic sounds (PPV 0.93, NPV 0.80), and ictal vocalizations (PPV 1.00, NPV 0.97).
This phase I feasibility study shows that epileptologists are able to accurately identify certain seizure types from audio recordings when the seizures produce sounds. This provides guidance for the development of audio-based seizure detection devices and demonstrate which seizure types could potentially be detected.
一项旨在确定基于音频记录识别癫痫发作准确性的 I 期可行性研究。
我们系统性地从 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间在癫痫监测单元住院的 83 名患者中生成了 166 个时长 30 秒的音频片段,每个患者的每个片段都包含发作期和非发作期各一个。五名癫痫专家对音频片段进行了盲法评估,并对是否发生癫痫发作以及评估的置信水平(低或高)进行了评级。计算了个体和共识评级的准确性。
五名癫痫专家的共识评级总体表现出阳性预测值(PPV)为 0.91,阴性预测值(NPV)为 0.66。当置信度较高时,表现有所提高(PPV 为 0.96,NPV 为 0.70)。癫痫专家之间的一致性为中度,kappa 值为 0.584。多动性(PPV 为 0.92,NPV 为 0.86)和强直-阵挛性(PPV 和 NPV 均为 1.00)发作的识别最为准确。仅有自动症和非运动性发作的癫痫不能准确识别。与准确识别相关的特定癫痫相关声音包括呼吸紊乱(PPV 和 NPV 均为 1.00)、节律性声音(PPV 为 0.93,NPV 为 0.80)和癫痫发作时的发声(PPV 为 1.00,NPV 为 0.97)。
这项 I 期可行性研究表明,当癫痫发作产生声音时,癫痫专家能够从音频记录中准确识别某些癫痫发作类型。这为基于音频的癫痫发作检测设备的开发提供了指导,并展示了哪些类型的癫痫发作可能被检测到。