Breitenmoser J, Mörmann W, Mühlemann H R
SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1978 Jan;88(1):79-89.
The ability of two different toothbrush bristle ends to produce traumatic gingival abrasion was assessed in a double blind study on 15 male and 15 female young adults. Brushing was performed in a circular fashion using a modified Bass technique. An apparatus allowing continuous visual feedback of the average brushing force permitted a degree of standardisation of the system. The upper left canine and bicuspid area had to be brushed for 30 seconds with cut toothbrush bristles (CP) and with round ended toothbrush bristles (RP) respectively. A two-week interval separated the two brushing sessions. Traumatic lesions of the attached gingiva were stained with a disclosing solution, photographed and evaluated planimetrically. The "cut bristles" caused gingival abrasions 30% greater in extent than the round end bristles. The difference was not due to single brushing strokes accidentally greater for the "cut bristles". The size of the lesions was not sex-dependent.
在一项针对15名年轻男性和15名年轻女性的双盲研究中,评估了两种不同牙刷刷毛末端导致创伤性牙龈磨损的能力。采用改良的巴氏技术以圆周方式刷牙。一种能持续视觉反馈平均刷牙力的装置使系统达到了一定程度的标准化。分别用切割刷毛(CP)和圆头刷毛(RP)对上颌左尖牙和双尖牙区域刷牙30秒。两次刷牙之间间隔两周。用一种显色溶液对附着龈的创伤性病变进行染色,拍照并进行平面测量评估。“切割刷毛”导致的牙龈磨损范围比圆头刷毛大30%。这种差异并非由于“切割刷毛”偶然出现单次刷牙力度更大所致。病变大小与性别无关。