Danser M M, Timmerman M F, IJzerman Y, Bulthuis H, van der Velden U, van der Weijden G A
Department of Periodontology, ACTA Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Sep;25(9):701-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02510.x.
The aims of the present study were: (1) to establish the incidence of gingival abrasion as a result of toothbrushing, using a manual and electric toothbrush; (2) to establish the influence of filament end-rounding on the incidence of gingival abrasion and the efficacy of toothbrushing; (3) to assess whether the speed of the electric brush has a feedback-effect on the brushing force used and to correlate the incidence of gingival abrasion with force. 2 experiments were carried out. In the first experiment, 50 subjects brushed for 3 weeks every other day with either a manual (Butler 411) or an electric toothbrush (Braun/Oral-B Ultra Plaque Remover-D9). All received brief instructions and were asked to abstain from oral hygiene 24 hrs before their appointment. After disclosing the teeth and gums with Mira-2-Tone solution, plaque and gingival abrasion were assessed. Next, the panelists brushed in a random split-mouth order. After brushing and a second disclosing, plaque and abrasion were re-assessed. The results showed that the incidence of gingival abrasion was comparable for the manual and the D9. Using a similar design as in experiment no. 1, in experiment no. 2 a new group of 47 subjects brushed for 3 weeks alternating between the Braun/Oral-B Plaque Remover-D7 and D9. At the appointment, the subjects first brushed in a split-mouth order with the D9 with 2 different types of endrounding. Plaque and abrasion were assessed. Immediately following this brushing exercise, the subjects re-brushed with the D7 (2800 rot/min) and the D9 (3600 rot/min) during which brushing force was measured. The results of this experiment showed that endrounding has no effect on plaque removal but does effect the incidence of gingival abrasion. Brushing force is not influenced by the speed of the brushhead and no correlation with the incidence of gingival abrasion was observed. In conclusion, the results of this study show that gingival abrasion is not influenced by brushing force, but is affected by filament endrounding.
(1)使用手动牙刷和电动牙刷确定刷牙导致牙龈磨损的发生率;(2)确定刷毛末端倒圆对牙龈磨损发生率和刷牙效果的影响;(3)评估电动牙刷的速度是否对所用刷牙力度有反馈作用,并将牙龈磨损发生率与力度相关联。进行了两项实验。在第一个实验中,50名受试者每隔一天用手动牙刷(巴特勒411)或电动牙刷(博朗/欧乐 - B超洁力牙刷 - D9)刷牙3周。所有人都接受了简短的指导,并被要求在预约前24小时停止口腔卫生护理。用Mira - 2 - 色调溶液使牙齿和牙龈染色后,评估牙菌斑和牙龈磨损情况。接下来,小组成员以随机的半口方式刷牙。刷牙并再次染色后,重新评估牙菌斑和磨损情况。结果表明,手动牙刷和D9的牙龈磨损发生率相当。在实验2中,采用与实验1类似的设计,一组新的47名受试者使用博朗/欧乐 - B除菌斑牙刷 - D7和D9交替刷牙3周。在预约时,受试者首先以半口方式用D9以两种不同类型的末端倒圆方式刷牙。评估牙菌斑和磨损情况。在此刷牙练习之后,受试者立即用D7(2800转/分钟)和D9(3600转/分钟)再次刷牙,在此期间测量刷牙力度。该实验结果表明,末端倒圆对牙菌斑清除没有影响,但对牙龈磨损发生率有影响。刷牙力度不受刷头速度的影响,且未观察到与牙龈磨损发生率有相关性。总之,本研究结果表明牙龈磨损不受刷牙力度影响,但受刷毛末端倒圆影响。