Salavati Mahyar, Akhbari Behnam, Takamjani Ismail Ebrahimi, Bagheri Hossein, Ezzati Kamran, Kahlaee Amir Hossein
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Apr;20(2):441-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
Motor control approach towards chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) has gained increasing attention. CNLBP patients have shown to be more visually dependent for the postural control process than control subjects but no study has yet investigated the treatment programs effect on this disorder.
Forty CNLBP patients volunteered to participate in this experimental study. The subjects were randomly assigned into either stabilization exercise (SE) or control group both receiving 12 sessions of routine physiotherapy for four weeks. The SE group also received intensive stabilization exercise. Balance (in terms of overall (OSI), anteroposterior (APSI) and mediolateral stability indices (MLSI)) and functional disability were assessed by Biodex Balance System(®) (BBS) and Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire, respectively prior and after the interventions. The balance tests were performed with open and closed eyes.
Both interventions significantly decreased all stability indices but the SE group showed a more pronounced improvement in OSI and APSI. In the SE group, vision deprivation had smaller destabilizing effects on OSI and APSI as compared with the control group. The groups were not statistically different prior and after the interventions on all dependent variables. Oswestry index reduction in the SE group was more pronounced but the interaction of time and group variables were not significant on pain intensity.
Both interventions effectively enhanced stability indices and functional capabilities and reduced pain intensity in CNLBP patients. The SE protocol made the patients less visual dependent perhaps via better stability. Since pain reduction was not different between the groups, more functional improvement in SE group cannot simply be interpreted via the pain interference and might be related to postural control capabilities of the patients.
针对慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)的运动控制方法已受到越来越多的关注。与对照组相比,CNLBP患者在姿势控制过程中表现出更强的视觉依赖性,但尚无研究调查治疗方案对这种疾病的影响。
40名CNLBP患者自愿参与本实验研究。受试者被随机分为稳定化运动(SE)组或对照组,两组均接受为期四周的12节常规物理治疗。SE组还接受强化稳定化运动。分别在干预前后,通过Biodex平衡系统(®)(BBS)和Oswestry下腰痛残疾问卷评估平衡能力(根据总体(OSI)、前后(APSI)和内外侧稳定性指数(MLSI))和功能障碍。平衡测试在睁眼和闭眼状态下进行。
两种干预均显著降低了所有稳定性指数,但SE组在OSI和APSI方面的改善更为明显。在SE组中,与对照组相比,视觉剥夺对OSI和APSI的不稳定影响较小。在所有因变量上,干预前后两组无统计学差异。SE组的Oswestry指数降低更为明显,但时间和组变量的交互作用对疼痛强度无显著影响。
两种干预均有效提高了CNLBP患者的稳定性指数和功能能力,并降低了疼痛强度。SE方案可能通过更好的稳定性使患者减少了对视觉的依赖。由于两组之间疼痛减轻程度无差异,SE组更多的功能改善不能简单地通过疼痛干扰来解释,可能与患者的姿势控制能力有关。