Walz Courtney P, Barry Arden R, Koshman Sheri L
Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre (Walz), Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Red Deer, Alberta.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2016 May;149(3):166-73. doi: 10.1177/1715163516640812. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have purported protective cardiovascular (CV) effects. We sought to assess the evidence available for the use of omega-3 PUFAs for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1999 to 2015. Placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled over 1000 patients with follow-up greater than 1 year and meta-analyses of RCTs were included.
Eight RCTs and 2 meta-analyses were included. In patients with preexisting CVD, only 1 of 5 included RCTs demonstrated a reduction in CV events with omega-3 PUFAs; however, the effect size was minimal, and the study was limited by an open-label design and lack of placebo control. Two meta-analyses concluded omega-3 PUFAs do not reduce CV events in addition to standard, evidence-based therapy in patients after myocardial infarction. Of the 3 predominantly primary prevention RCTs, only 1 demonstrated a minor reduction in major coronary events; however, it was also an open-label study. Furthermore, the safety of omega-3 PUFAs should be considered. While data from RCTs have not demonstrated serious safety concerns, omega-3 PUFAs can increase the risk of bleeding and may interact with other medications that affect hemostasis, such as antiplatelet agents and warfarin.
There is currently a lack of evidence to support the routine use of omega-3 PUFAs in the primary and secondary prevention of CVD. Pharmacists are ideally situated to engage patients in the discussion of the lack of benefit and possible risk of omega-3 PUFA supplements.
ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)据称具有心血管(CV)保护作用。我们试图评估使用ω-3 PUFAs预防心血管疾病(CVD)的现有证据。
使用MEDLINE和EMBASE对1999年至2015年的文献进行系统检索。纳入了超过1000例患者、随访时间超过1年的安慰剂对照随机对照试验(RCTs)以及RCTs的荟萃分析。
纳入了8项RCTs和2项荟萃分析。在已患有CVD的患者中,5项纳入的RCTs中只有1项显示ω-3 PUFAs可降低CV事件;然而,效应量极小,且该研究存在开放标签设计和缺乏安慰剂对照的局限性。两项荟萃分析得出结论,在心肌梗死后的患者中,除了标准的循证治疗外,ω-3 PUFAs并不能降低CV事件。在3项主要为一级预防的RCTs中,只有1项显示主要冠状动脉事件略有减少;然而,这也是一项开放标签研究。此外,应考虑ω-3 PUFAs的安全性。虽然RCTs的数据未显示严重的安全问题,但ω-3 PUFAs可增加出血风险,并可能与其他影响止血的药物相互作用,如抗血小板药物和华法林。
目前缺乏证据支持在CVD的一级和二级预防中常规使用ω-3 PUFAs。药剂师非常适合与患者讨论ω-3 PUFA补充剂缺乏益处和可能存在的风险。