Sivasubramaniam Diane, Franks Ashley E
a Department of Psychological Sciences , Swinburne University , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.
b Department of Physiology , Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.
Bioengineered. 2016 Apr;7(3):137-44. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1187346.
The bioengineering of individual microbial organisms or microbial communities has great potential in agriculture, bioremediation and industry. Understanding community level drivers can improve community level functions to enhance desired outcomes in complex environments, whereas individual microbes can be reduced to a programmable biological unit for specific output goals. While understanding the bioengineering potential of both approaches leads to a wide range of potential uses, public acceptance of such technology may be the greatest hindrance to its application. Public perceptions and expectations of "naturalness," as well as notions of disgust and dread, may delay the development of such technologies to their full benefit. We discuss these bioengineering approaches and draw on the psychological literature to suggest strategies that scientists can use to allay public concerns over the implementation of this technology.
单个微生物有机体或微生物群落的生物工程在农业、生物修复和工业领域具有巨大潜力。了解群落层面的驱动因素可以改善群落层面的功能,以在复杂环境中增强预期结果,而单个微生物可以简化为用于特定产出目标的可编程生物单元。虽然了解这两种方法的生物工程潜力会带来广泛的潜在用途,但公众对此类技术的接受度可能是其应用的最大障碍。公众对“天然性”的认知和期望,以及厌恶和恐惧观念,可能会推迟此类技术充分发挥其效益的发展进程。我们讨论了这些生物工程方法,并借鉴心理学文献提出科学家可以用来减轻公众对该技术实施的担忧的策略。