Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄比亚水生大型无脊椎动物对农药硫丹和二嗪磷的敏感性与文献数据的比较。

Sensitivity of Ethiopian aquatic macroinvertebrates to the pesticides endosulfan and diazinon, compared to literature data.

机构信息

Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management, Wageningen University, Wageningen University and Research centre, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

College of Natural Sciences, University of Addis Ababa, 4 Kiklo Campus, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Ecotoxicology. 2016 Aug;25(6):1226-33. doi: 10.1007/s10646-016-1676-0. Epub 2016 May 24.

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to present a methodology for toxicity tests that can be used when analytical resources to verify the test concentrations are limited, and to evaluate whether the sensitivity of a limited number of Ethiopian species to pesticides differs from literature values for, mainly, temperate species. Acute toxicity tests were performed using three Ethiopian aquatic invertebrate species, one crustacean (Diaphanosoma brachyurum) and two insects (Anopheles pharoensis and Culex pipiens) and using the pesticides endosulfan and diazinon. All species-pesticide combinations were tested in duplicate to estimate the consistency, i.e. the intra-laboratory variation, in test results. Daphnia magna was tested as well to allow the test results to be compared directly with values from the literature. Results indicate that the differences between the EC50s obtained for D. magna in this study and those reported in the literature were less than a factor of 2. This indicates that the methodology used is able to provide credible toxicity values. The results of the duplicated tests showed intra-laboratory variation in EC50 values of up to a factor of 3, with one test showing a difference of a factor of 6 at 48 h. Comparison with available literature results for arthropod species using species sensitivity distributions indicated that the test results obtained in this study fit well in the log-normal distribution of the literature values. We conclude that the methodology of performing multiple tests to check for consistency of test results and performing tests with D. magna for comparison with literature values to check for accuracy is able to provide reliable effect threshold levels and that the tested Ethiopian species did not differ in sensitivity from the arthropod species reported on in the literature.

摘要

本研究的目的是提出一种毒性测试方法,当分析资源有限,无法验证测试浓度时,可以使用该方法,并评估有限数量的埃塞俄比亚物种对农药的敏感性是否与主要为温带物种的文献值不同。使用三种埃塞俄比亚水生无脊椎动物物种(一种甲壳类动物(Daphnia brachyurum)和两种昆虫(Anopheles pharoensis 和 Culex pipiens)以及农药硫丹和二嗪农进行了急性毒性测试。所有物种-农药组合均进行了两次测试,以估计测试结果的一致性,即实验室内部变异。还测试了大型溞,以允许将测试结果与文献中的值直接进行比较。结果表明,本研究中获得的 D. magna 的 EC50 值与文献中报道的值之间的差异小于 2 倍。这表明所使用的方法能够提供可靠的毒性值。重复测试的结果表明,EC50 值的实验室内部变异高达 3 倍,其中一项测试在 48 小时时显示差异高达 6 倍。使用物种敏感性分布对节肢动物物种的可用文献结果进行比较表明,本研究中获得的测试结果与文献值的对数正态分布吻合良好。我们得出结论,执行多次测试以检查测试结果一致性并使用 D. magna 进行测试以与文献值进行比较以检查准确性的方法能够提供可靠的效应阈值水平,并且测试的埃塞俄比亚物种的敏感性与文献中报道的节肢动物物种没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb6/4921108/051fd8510418/10646_2016_1676_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验