Robinson Bruce M, Akizawa Tadao, Jager Kitty J, Kerr Peter G, Saran Rajiv, Pisoni Ronald L
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.
Lancet. 2016 Jul 16;388(10041):294-306. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30448-2. Epub 2016 May 22.
More than 2 million people worldwide are being treated for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This Series paper provides an overview of incidence, modality use (in-centre haemodialysis, home dialysis, or transplantation), and mortality for patients with ESKD based on national registry data. We also present data from an international cohort study to highlight differences in haemodialysis practices that affect survival and the experience of patients who rely on this therapy, which is both life-sustaining and profoundly disruptive to their quality of life. Data illustrate disparities in access to renal replacement therapy of any kind and in the use of transplantation or home dialysis, both of which are widely considered preferable to in-centre haemodialysis for many patients with ESKD in settings where infrastructure permits. For most patients with ESKD worldwide who are treated with in-centre haemodialysis, overall survival is poor, but longer in some Asian countries than elsewhere in the world, and longer in Europe than in the USA, although this gap has reduced. Commendable haemodialysis practice includes exceptionally high use of surgical vascular access in Japan and in some European countries, and the use of longer or more frequent dialysis sessions in some countries, allowing for more effective volume management. Mortality is especially high soon after ESKD onset, and improved preparation for ESKD is needed including alignment of decision making with the wishes of patients and families.
全球有超过200万人正在接受终末期肾病(ESKD)治疗。本系列论文基于国家登记数据,概述了ESKD患者的发病率、治疗方式使用情况(中心血液透析、家庭透析或移植)以及死亡率。我们还展示了一项国际队列研究的数据,以突出血液透析实践中的差异,这些差异会影响生存率以及依赖这种维持生命但对生活质量有极大干扰的治疗方式的患者的体验。数据表明,在获得任何形式的肾脏替代治疗以及移植或家庭透析的使用方面存在差异,在基础设施允许的情况下,对于许多ESKD患者而言,这两种方式普遍被认为优于中心血液透析。对于全球大多数接受中心血液透析治疗的ESKD患者来说,总体生存率较低,但在一些亚洲国家比世界其他地方要长,在欧洲比美国要长,尽管这种差距已经缩小。值得称赞的血液透析实践包括在日本和一些欧洲国家极高的外科血管通路使用率,以及在一些国家使用更长或更频繁的透析疗程,从而实现更有效的容量管理。ESKD发病后不久死亡率尤其高,需要改善对ESKD的准备工作,包括使决策与患者及其家属的意愿保持一致。