Goldberg Jessica, Hinchey Jenna, Feder Shelli, Schulman-Green Dena
Yale School of Nursing, West Haven, CT, USA.
Yale School of Nursing, West Haven, CT, USA
West J Nurs Res. 2016 Oct;38(10):1243-63. doi: 10.1177/0193945916650675. Epub 2016 May 25.
Reports of self-management interventions usually focus on efficacy and do not detail processes of intervention development and evaluation. We describe the development and evaluation of Managing Cancer Care: A Personal Guide, a patient-oriented cancer self-management intervention consisting of seven modules on the topics of self-management, care options, transitions, communication, symptom management, and self-efficacy. We developed and evaluated the intervention in stages by partnering with women with breast cancer. Stages were as follows: individual interviews (n = 25), intervention design, focus group (n = 6), pilot testing with metastatic patients (n = 23), and population testing with non-metastatic patients (n = 105). We used interpretive description and content analysis for qualitative analyses and used descriptive statistics to analyze module ratings and frequency of use. We report results of each stage and discuss the challenges of creating a self-management intervention that has broad appeal without taking a one-size-fits-all approach and implementing a self-management intervention in a real-world versus research setting.
自我管理干预措施的报告通常侧重于疗效,并未详细说明干预措施的开发和评估过程。我们描述了《管理癌症护理:个人指南》的开发和评估情况,这是一项以患者为导向的癌症自我管理干预措施,由关于自我管理、护理选择、过渡、沟通、症状管理和自我效能等主题的七个模块组成。我们通过与乳腺癌女性患者合作,分阶段开发和评估了该干预措施。阶段如下:个体访谈(n = 25)、干预设计、焦点小组(n = 6)、对转移性患者进行试点测试(n = 23)以及对非转移性患者进行群体测试(n = 105)。我们采用解释性描述和内容分析进行定性分析,并使用描述性统计分析模块评分和使用频率。我们报告每个阶段的结果,并讨论创建一种具有广泛吸引力且不采用一刀切方法的自我管理干预措施,以及在现实世界而非研究环境中实施自我管理干预措施所面临的挑战。