Sarto F, Veronesi G
Department of Economics, Management, Institutions, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Accounting and Finance Division, Leeds University Business School, Leeds, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 24;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):169. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1395-5.
A widespread assumption across health systems suggests that greater clinicians' involvement in governance and management roles would have wider benefits for the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare organisations. However, despite growing interest around the topic, it is still poorly understood how managers with a clinical background might specifically affect healthcare performance outcomes. The purpose of this review is, therefore, to map out and critically appraise quantitatively-oriented studies investigating this phenomenon within the acute hospital sector.
The review has focused on scientific papers published in English in international journals and conference proceedings. The articles have been extracted through a Boolean search strategy from ISI Web of Science citation and search source. No time constraints were imposed. A manual search by keywords and citation tracking was also conducted concentrating on highly ranked public sector governance and management journals. Nineteen papers were identified as a match for the research criteria and, subsequently, were classified on the basis of six items. Finally, a thematic mapping has been carried out leading to identify three main research sub-streams on the basis of the types of performance outcomes investigated.
The analysis of the extant literature has revealed that research focusing on clinicians' involvement in leadership positions has explored its implications for the management of financial resources, the quality of care offered and the social performance of service providers. In general terms, the findings show a positive impact of clinical leadership on different types of outcome measures, with only a handful of studies highlighting a negative impact on financial and social performance. Therefore, this review lends support to the prevalent move across health systems towards increasing the presence of clinicians in leadership positions in healthcare organisations. Furthermore, we present an explanatory model summarising the reasons offered in the reviewed studies to justify the findings and provide suggestions for future research.
卫生系统中一种普遍的假设认为,临床医生更多地参与治理和管理角色将对医疗保健组织的效率和效益产生更广泛的益处。然而,尽管围绕该主题的兴趣日益浓厚,但临床背景的管理者如何具体影响医疗绩效结果仍知之甚少。因此,本综述的目的是梳理并批判性地评估针对急性医院部门内这一现象的定量研究。
本综述聚焦于在国际期刊和会议论文集中以英文发表的科学论文。这些文章通过布尔搜索策略从ISI科学网引文和搜索源中提取。未设时间限制。还通过关键词手动搜索和引文追踪,重点关注排名靠前的公共部门治理和管理期刊。确定了19篇符合研究标准的论文,随后根据六个项目进行了分类。最后,进行了主题映射,根据所调查的绩效结果类型确定了三个主要研究子流。
对现有文献的分析表明,关注临床医生担任领导职位的研究探讨了其对财务资源管理、所提供护理质量和服务提供者社会绩效的影响。总体而言,研究结果显示临床领导力对不同类型的结果指标有积极影响,只有少数研究强调对财务和社会绩效有负面影响。因此,本综述支持卫生系统中普遍采取的举措,即增加临床医生在医疗保健组织领导职位中的占比。此外,我们提出了一个解释模型,总结了综述研究中为证明研究结果而给出的理由,并为未来研究提供建议。