Suppr超能文献

小儿耳整形术中的家长决策:共同决策在家长决策冲突和决策后悔中的作用。

Parental decision making in pediatric otoplasty: The role of shared decision making in parental decisional conflict and decisional regret.

作者信息

Hong Paul, Gorodzinsky Ayala Y, Taylor Benjamin A, Chorney Jill MacLaren

机构信息

Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

School of Human Communication Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2016 Jul;126 Suppl 5:S5-S13. doi: 10.1002/lary.26071. Epub 2016 May 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To date, there has been little research on shared decision making and decisional outcomes in pediatric surgery. The objectives of this study were to describe the level of decisional conflict and decisional regret experienced by parents considering otoplasty for their children, and to determine if they are related to perceptions of shared decision making.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort clinical study.

METHODS

Sixty-five consecutive parents of children who underwent surgical consultation for otoplasty were prospectively enrolled. Participants completed the Demographic Form, the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire after the consultation visit. The consulting surgeons completed the physician version of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire. Six months after surgery, parents completed the Decisional Regret Scale.

RESULTS

The median decisional conflict was 15.63; 21 (32.8%) parents scored 25 or above, a previously defined cutoff indicating clinically significant decisional conflict. Parent ratings of shared decision making and decisional conflict were significantly negatively correlated (P < 0.001); however, there was no significant correlation between physician ratings of shared decision making and parental decisional conflict. Significant decisional regret was reported in two (3.2%) participants. Decisional regret and parent and physician ratings of shared decision making were both significantly negatively correlated (P = 0.044 and P = 0.001, respectively). Decisional regret and decisional conflict scores were significantly positively correlated (P = 0.001). Parent and physician ratings of shared decision making were correlated (intraclass correlation = 0.625, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Many parents experienced significant decisional conflict when making decisions about their child's elective surgical treatment. Fewer parents experienced significant decisional regret after the procedure. Parents who perceived themselves as being more involved in the decision making process reported less decisional conflict and decisional regret. Parents and physicians had varied perceptions of the degree of shared decision making. Future research should develop interventions to increase parents' involvement in decision making and explore the influence of significant decisional conflict and decisional regret on health outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b. Laryngoscope, 126:S5-S13, 2016.

摘要

目的/假设:迄今为止,关于小儿外科共同决策及决策结果的研究甚少。本研究的目的是描述考虑为孩子进行耳整形手术的家长所经历的决策冲突水平和决策后悔程度,并确定它们是否与共同决策的认知相关。

研究设计

前瞻性队列临床研究。

方法

前瞻性纳入65名连续接受耳整形手术咨询的患儿家长。参与者在咨询就诊后完成人口统计学表格、决策冲突量表和共同决策问卷。咨询外科医生完成共同决策问卷的医生版。术后6个月,家长完成决策后悔量表。

结果

决策冲突的中位数为15.63;21名(32.8%)家长得分在25分及以上,先前定义的临界值表明存在具有临床意义的决策冲突。家长对共同决策和决策冲突的评分呈显著负相关(P < 0.001);然而,医生对共同决策的评分与家长的决策冲突之间无显著相关性。两名(3.2%)参与者报告有显著的决策后悔。决策后悔与家长和医生对共同决策的评分均呈显著负相关(分别为P = 0.044和P = 0.001)。决策后悔与决策冲突得分呈显著正相关(P = 0.001)。家长和医生对共同决策的评分相关(组内相关系数 = 0.625,P < 0.001)。

结论

许多家长在为孩子的择期手术治疗做决策时经历了显著的决策冲突。术后经历显著决策后悔的家长较少。认为自己更多参与决策过程的家长报告的决策冲突和决策后悔较少。家长和医生对共同决策程度的认知存在差异。未来的研究应开发干预措施以增加家长在决策中的参与度,并探索显著的决策冲突和决策后悔对健康结果的影响。

证据水平

2b。《喉镜》,2016年,第126卷:S5 - S13。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验