Suppr超能文献

辅助和转移性乳腺癌患者使用电子调查问卷(ePRO)的意愿取决于社会人口统计学因素、健康相关生活质量、疾病状态和计算机技能。

Willingness of Patients with Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant and Metastatic Setting to Use Electronic Surveys (ePRO) Depends on Sociodemographic Factors, Health-related Quality of Life, Disease Status and Computer Skills.

作者信息

Graf J, Simoes E, Wißlicen K, Rava L, Walter C B, Hartkopf A, Keilmann L, Taran A, Wallwiener S, Fasching P, Brucker S Y, Wallwiener M

机构信息

Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen; Forschungsinstitut für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen; Abteilung Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen.

Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen; Forschungsinstitut für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen; Stabsstelle Sozialmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 May;76(5):535-541. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105872.

Abstract

Because of the often unfavorable prognosis, particularly for patients with metastases, health-related quality of life is extremely important for breast cancer patients. In recent years, data on patient-relevant endpoints is being increasingly collected electronically; however, knowledge on the acceptance and practicability of, and barriers to, this form of data collection remains limited. A questionnaire was completed by 96 patients to determine to what extent existing computer skills, disease status, health-related quality of life and sociodemographic factors affect patients' potential willingness to use electronics methods of data collection (ePRO). 52 of 96 (55 %) patients reported a priori that they could envisage using ePRO. Patients who a priori preferred a paper-based survey (pPRO) tended to be older (ePRO 53 years vs. pPRO 62 years; p = 0.0014) and typically had lower levels of education (p = 0.0002), were in poorer health (p = 0.0327) and had fewer computer skills (p = 0.0003). Barriers to the prospective use of ePRO were identified in older patients and patients with a lower quality of life. Given the appropriate conditions with regard to age, education and current health status, opportunities to participate should be provided to encourage patients' willingness to take part and ensure the validity of survey results. Focusing on ease of use of ePRO applications and making applications more patient-oriented and straightforward appears to be the way forward.

摘要

由于预后往往不佳,尤其是对于有转移的患者,与健康相关的生活质量对乳腺癌患者极为重要。近年来,与患者相关的终点数据越来越多地通过电子方式收集;然而,关于这种数据收集形式的接受度、实用性以及障碍的知识仍然有限。96名患者完成了一份问卷,以确定现有的计算机技能、疾病状态、与健康相关的生活质量和社会人口学因素在多大程度上影响患者使用电子数据收集方法(电子患者报告结局,ePRO)的潜在意愿。96名患者中有52名(55%)事先表示他们可以设想使用ePRO。事先更喜欢纸质调查问卷(pPRO)的患者往往年龄较大(ePRO组53岁,pPRO组62岁;p = 0.0014),教育水平通常较低(p = 0.0002),健康状况较差(p = 0.0327),计算机技能较少(p = 0.0003)。在老年患者和生活质量较低的患者中发现了前瞻性使用ePRO的障碍。考虑到年龄、教育程度和当前健康状况等适当条件,应提供参与机会,以鼓励患者参与意愿并确保调查结果的有效性。关注ePRO应用程序的易用性并使应用程序更以患者为导向且简单明了似乎是前进的方向。

相似文献

6
Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Dec 23;15:110. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y.
7
[Practicability and Efficiency of E-health Applications in Patient-Reported Outcomes: State of and Need for Research].
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Nov;80(11):953-962. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-100037. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
Capturing patient-reported outcomes: paper versus electronic survey administration.
OTA Int. 2022 Sep 8;5(3):e212. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000212. eCollection 2022 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic patient-reported outcome systems and capabilities in cancer care: a systematic review.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;7:1560533. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1560533. eCollection 2025.
2
Advancing patient-centered cancer care: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcome measures.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Sep 25;5:1427712. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1427712. eCollection 2024.
3
The advantages, disadvantages, threats, and opportunities of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in cancer: A systematic review.
Digit Health. 2024 May 27;10:20552076241257146. doi: 10.1177/20552076241257146. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Health status based on EQ-5D-5L for the cancer patient population in Malaysia.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 8;14(1):8152. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58844-8.
7
Assessments of a novel digital follow-up tool Rehabkompassen to identify rehabilitation needs among stroke patients in an outpatient setting.
Digit Health. 2022 Jun 3;8:20552076221104662. doi: 10.1177/20552076221104662. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
10
Supporting Medical Staff from Psycho-Oncology with Smart Mobile Devices: Insights into the Development Process and First Results.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 11;18(10):5092. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105092.

本文引用的文献

4
Biomarkers in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer and the PRAEGNANT Study Network.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Jan;75(1):41-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396215.
6
Prognostic factors for patients with bone-only metastasis in breast cancer.
Yonsei Med J. 2013 Sep;54(5):1168-77. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.5.1168.
8
[Acceptance and reliability of an electronic psychooncological screening of patients with breast cancer: a randomized controlled study].
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2013 Sep;63(9-10):374-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333301. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
9
Combination anastrozole and fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 2;367(5):435-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201622.
10
[The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview].
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012 May;124(9-10):293-303. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0168-3. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验