Wintner L M, Giesinger J M, Zabernigg A, Rumpold G, Sztankay M, Oberguggenberger A S, Gamper E M, Holzner B
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr.35, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Dec 23;15:110. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y.
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a more comprehensive picture of patients' quality of life than do mere physicians' ratings. Electronic data collection of PRO offers several advantages and allows assessments at patients' homes as well. This study reports on patients' personal internet use, their attitudes towards electronic and web-based PRO assessment (clinic-ePRO and home-ePRO) and the feasibility of these two assessment modes.
At the Medical University of Innsbruck and Kufstein County Hospital, cancer patients who participated in clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO were asked to complete a comprehensive evaluation form on their personal internet usage, attitudes towards and the feasibility of routine clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO with the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) software.
In total, 113 patients completed the evaluation form for clinic-ePRO (Ø 45 years, SD 14) and 45 patients for home-ePRO (Ø 58 years, SD 10; 33.1 per cent inclusion rate for this sample). Most patients expressed willingness to complete routine clinic-ePRO assessments in the future (94.7 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 84.4 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and to discuss their data with attending physicians (82.2 per cent, home-ePRO patients only). Overall, patients preferred the software over paper-pencil questionnaires (67.2 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 60 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and experienced it as easy to use. Only a few minor suggestions for improvement were made (e.g. adjustable font sizes).
The use of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO was in general shown to be feasible and well accepted. However, to be more inclusive in the implementation of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO, educational programs concerning their particular benefit in oncology practice potentially could enhance patients' attitudes towards, and consequently their acceptance of and compliance with electronic PRO assessments.
患者报告结局(PRO)比单纯的医生评分能更全面地反映患者的生活质量。PRO的电子数据收集具有诸多优势,还能让患者在家中进行评估。本研究报告了患者的个人互联网使用情况、他们对电子和基于网络的PRO评估(门诊电子PRO和家庭电子PRO)的态度以及这两种评估方式的可行性。
在因斯布鲁克医科大学和库夫施泰因县医院,参与门诊电子PRO/家庭电子PRO的癌症患者被要求使用基于计算机的健康评估系统(CHES)软件,填写一份关于其个人互联网使用情况、对常规门诊电子PRO/家庭电子PRO的态度及可行性的综合评估表。
共有113名患者完成了门诊电子PRO的评估表(平均年龄45岁,标准差14),45名患者完成了家庭电子PRO的评估表(平均年龄58岁,标准差10;该样本的纳入率为33.1%)。大多数患者表示愿意在未来完成常规门诊电子PRO评估(门诊电子PRO患者中的94.7%和家庭电子PRO患者中的84.4%),并愿意与主治医生讨论他们的数据(仅家庭电子PRO患者中的82.2%)。总体而言,患者更喜欢该软件而非纸质问卷(门诊电子PRO患者中的67.2%和家庭电子PRO患者中的60%),并认为其易于使用。仅提出了一些小的改进建议(例如可调整字体大小)。
总体而言,门诊电子PRO/家庭电子PRO的使用是可行的且广受接受。然而,为了在门诊电子PRO/家庭电子PRO的实施中更具包容性,有关其在肿瘤学实践中特殊益处的教育项目可能会增强患者对电子PRO评估的态度,进而提高他们对其的接受度和依从性。