Niermann Christina Y N, Herrmann Christian, von Haaren Birte, van Kann Dave, Woll Alexander
Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Karlsruhe, Germany.
Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel Basel, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2016 May 9;7:677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00677. eCollection 2016.
Traditionally, cognitive, motivational, and volitional determinants have been used to explain and predict health behaviors such as physical activity. Recently, the role of affect in influencing and regulating health behaviors received more attention. Affects as internal cues may automatically activate unconscious processes of behavior regulation. The aim of our study was to examine the association between affect and physical activity in daily life. In addition, we studied the influence of the habit of being physically active on this relationship. An ambulatory assessment study in 89 persons (33.7% male, 25 to 65 years, M = 45.2, SD = 8.1) was conducted. Affect was assessed in the afternoon on 5 weekdays using smartphones. Physical activity was measured continuously objectively using accelerometers and subjectively using smartphones in the evening. Habit strength was assessed at the beginning of the diary period. The outcomes were objectively and subjectively measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) performed after work. Multilevel regression models were used to analyze the association between affect and after work MVPA. In addition, the cross-level interaction of habit strength and affect on after work MVPA was tested. Positive affect was positively related to objectively measured and self-reported after work MVPA: the greater the positive affect the more time persons subsequently spent on MVPA. An inverse relationship was found for negative affect: the greater the negative affect the less time persons spent on MVPA. The cross-level interaction effect was significant only for objectively measured MVPA. A strong habit seems to strengthen both the positive influence of positive affect and the negative influence of negative affect. The results of this study confirm previous results and indicate that affect plays an important role for the regulation of physical activity behavior in daily life. The results for positive affect were consistent. However, in contrast to previous reports of no or an inverse association, negative affect decreased subsequent MVPA. These inconsistencies may be-in part-explained by the different measurements of affect in our and other studies. Therefore, further research is warranted to gain more insight into the association between affect and physical activity.
传统上,认知、动机和意志决定因素已被用于解释和预测诸如体育活动等健康行为。最近,情感在影响和调节健康行为中的作用受到了更多关注。情感作为内部线索可能会自动激活行为调节的无意识过程。我们研究的目的是检验日常生活中情感与体育活动之间的关联。此外,我们还研究了体育活动习惯对这种关系的影响。对89人(男性占33.7%,年龄在25至65岁之间,M = 45.2,SD = 8.1)进行了一项动态评估研究。在工作日的下午使用智能手机评估情感。使用加速度计客观地连续测量体育活动,并在晚上使用智能手机主观测量。在日记记录期开始时评估习惯强度。结果是下班后客观和主观测量的中度至剧烈体育活动(MVPA)。使用多层回归模型分析情感与下班后MVPA之间的关联。此外,还测试了习惯强度和情感对下班后MVPA的跨层次交互作用。积极情感与客观测量和自我报告的下班后MVPA呈正相关:积极情感越强,人们随后在MVPA上花费的时间就越多。消极情感则呈相反关系:消极情感越强,人们在MVPA上花费的时间就越少。跨层次交互作用仅对客观测量的MVPA显著。强烈的习惯似乎会加强积极情感的积极影响和消极情感的消极影响。本研究结果证实了先前的结果,并表明情感在日常生活中体育活动行为的调节中起着重要作用。积极情感的结果是一致的。然而,与之前无关联或呈相反关联的报道不同,消极情感会减少随后的MVPA。这些不一致之处可能部分是由于我们的研究和其他研究中情感测量方法的不同。因此,有必要进行进一步的研究,以更深入地了解情感与体育活动之间的关联。