Koene Joris M
Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Department of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Terrestrial Zoology, Naturalis Biodiversity Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mol Reprod Dev. 2017 Feb;84(2):132-143. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22662.
Sex determination is generally seen as an issue of importance for separate-sexed organisms; however, when considering other sexual systems, such as hermaphroditism, sex allocation is a less-binary form of sex determination. As illustrated here, with examples from molluscs, this different vantage point can offer important evolutionary insights. After all, males and females produce only one type of gamete, whereas hermaphrodites produce both. In addition, sperm and accessory gland products are donated bidirectionally. For reciprocal mating, this is obvious since sperm are exchanged within one mating interaction; but even unilaterally mating species end up mating in both sexual roles, albeit not simultaneously. With this in mind, I highlight two factors that play an important role in how reproductive investment is divided in snails: First, the individual's motivation to preferentially donate rather than receive sperm (or vice versa) leads to flexible behavioral performance, and thereby investment, of either sex. Second, due to the presence of both sexual roles within the same individual, partners are potentially able to influence investment in both sexual functions of their partner to their own benefit. The latter has already led to novel insights into how accessory gland products may evolve. Moreover, the current evidence points towards different ways in which allocation to reproduction can be changed in simultaneous hermaphrodites. These often differ from the separate-sexed situation, highlighting that comparison across different sexual systems may help identify commonalities and differences in physiological, and molecular mechanisms as well as evolutionary patterns. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 84: 132-143, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
性别决定通常被视为雌雄异体生物的一个重要问题;然而,当考虑其他性系统,如雌雄同体时,性别分配是一种不那么二元化的性别决定形式。如此处所示,以软体动物为例,这种不同的视角可以提供重要的进化见解。毕竟,雄性和雌性只产生一种类型的配子,而雌雄同体则产生两种。此外,精子和附属腺产物是双向捐赠的。对于互惠交配,这很明显,因为精子在一次交配互动中就会交换;但即使是单向交配的物种最终也会扮演两种性别角色进行交配,尽管不是同时进行。考虑到这一点,我强调了在蜗牛生殖投资分配中起重要作用的两个因素:第一,个体优先捐赠而非接受精子(或反之亦然)的动机导致了任一性别的灵活行为表现,进而导致投资的灵活变化。第二,由于同一个体内存在两种性别角色,伴侣有可能为了自身利益影响其伴侣两种性功能的投资。后者已经为附属腺产物可能如何进化带来了新的见解。此外,目前的证据表明,在同时雌雄同体中,分配给生殖的方式可能会以不同的方式发生变化。这些方式通常与雌雄异体的情况不同,这突出表明跨不同性系统的比较可能有助于识别生理、分子机制以及进化模式中的共性和差异。《分子生殖与发育》84: 132 - 143, 2017。© 2016威利期刊公司。