Siddik-Sayyid Sahar M, Aouad Marie T, Ibrahim Muhammad H, Taha Samar K, Nawfal Maud F, Tfaili Youssef J, Kaddoum Roland N
Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut - Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Aug;26(8):823-30. doi: 10.1111/pan.12935. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
Percutaneous cannulation of the femoral artery in the pediatric age group can be technically challenging, especially when performed by residents in training.
We examined whether the use of real-time ultrasound guidance is superior to a palpation landmark technique for femoral artery catheterization in children undergoing heart surgery.
Patients were prospectively randomized into two groups. In the palpation group, the femoral artery was cannulated using the traditional landmark method of palpation of arterial pulse. In the ultrasound group, cannulation was guided by real-time scanning with an ultrasound probe. Ten minutes were set as time limit for the resident's trials during which the time taken for attempted cannulation (primary outcome), number of attempts, number of successful cannulations on first attempt, and success rate were compared between the two groups. Adverse events were monitored on postoperative days 1 and 3.
A total of 106 patients were included in the study. The time taken for attempted femoral artery cannulation was shorter (301 ± 234 vs 420 ± 248 s; difference in mean: 119; 95% confidence interval (CI) of difference: 26-212; P = 0.012) and the number of attempts was lower [1 (1-10) vs 2 (1-5); difference in median: 1, 95% CI of difference: 0.28-1.72; P = 0.003] in the ultrasound group compared with the palpation group. The number of successful cannulations on first attempt was higher in the ultrasound group compared with palpation group [24/53 (45%) vs 13/53 (25%); odds ratio (OR): 2.54, 95% CI: 1.11-5.82; P = 0.025]. The number of patients who had successful cannulation was 31 of 55 (58%) in the palpation group and 40 of 53 (75%) in the ultrasound group (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 0.95-5.01; P = 0.06). None of the patients had adverse events at days 1 and 3.
Ultrasound-guided femoral arterial cannulation in children when performed by anesthesia residents is superior to the palpation technique based on the reduction of the time taken for attempted cannulation and the number of attempts, and improvement in first attempt success.
在儿科年龄组中,经皮股动脉插管在技术上可能具有挑战性,尤其是由住院医师进行操作时。
我们研究了在接受心脏手术的儿童中,使用实时超声引导进行股动脉插管是否优于触诊定位技术。
患者被前瞻性随机分为两组。在触诊组中,采用传统的触诊动脉搏动的定位方法进行股动脉插管。在超声组中,使用超声探头进行实时扫描引导插管。为住院医师的尝试设定10分钟的时间限制,在此期间比较两组间尝试插管所用时间(主要结果)、尝试次数、首次尝试成功插管次数及成功率。在术后第1天和第3天监测不良事件。
共有106例患者纳入研究。与触诊组相比,超声组尝试股动脉插管所用时间更短(301±234秒对420±248秒;平均差值:119;差值的95%置信区间:26 - 212;P = 0.012),尝试次数更少[1(1 - 10)对2(1 - 5);中位数差值:1,差值的95%置信区间:0.28 - 1.72;P = 0.003]。超声组首次尝试成功插管次数高于触诊组[24/53(45%)对13/53(25%);比值比(OR):2.54,95%置信区间:1.11 - 5.82;P = 0.025]。触诊组成功插管的患者有31/55(58%),超声组有40/53(75%)(OR:2.18,95%置信区间:0.95 - 5.01;P = 0.06)。在第1天和第3天,所有患者均未出现不良事件。
对于麻醉住院医师操作的儿童超声引导股动脉插管,基于减少尝试插管时间和尝试次数以及提高首次尝试成功率,其优于触诊技术。