Selbekk Anne Schanche, Sagvaag Hildegunn
Department of Research and Development, Rogaland A-senter, Stavanger, Norway.
Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research (KORFOR), Stavanger University Hospital, Norway.
Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Sep;38(7):1058-73. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12432. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
Research shows that members of the families with patients suffering from alcohol and other drug-related issues (AOD) experience stress and strain. An important question is, what options do AOD treatment have for them when it comes to support? To answer this, we interviewed directors and clinicians from three AOD treatment institutions in Norway. The study revealed that family-oriented practices are gaining ground as a 'going concern'. However, the relative position of family-orientation in the services, is constrained and shaped by three other going concerns related to: (i) discourse on health and illness, emphasising that addiction is an individual medical and psychological phenomenon, rather than a relational one; (ii) discourse on rights and involvement, emphasising the autonomy of the individual patient and their right to define the format of their own treatment; and (iii) discourse on management, emphasising the relationship between cost and benefit, where family-oriented practices are defined as not being cost-effective. All three discourses are connected to underpin the weight placed on individualised practices. Thus, the findings point to a paradox: there is a growing focus on the needs of children and affected family members, while the possibility of performing integrated work on families is limited.
研究表明,家中有酗酒及其他药物相关问题(AOD)患者的家庭成员会经历压力和紧张。一个重要的问题是,在提供支持方面,AOD治疗能为他们提供哪些选择?为了回答这个问题,我们采访了挪威三家AOD治疗机构的主任和临床医生。研究表明,以家庭为导向的做法正逐渐成为一种“持续经营”的模式。然而,家庭导向在服务中的相对地位受到另外三个“持续经营”相关因素的限制和影响:(i)关于健康与疾病的论述,强调成瘾是一种个体医学和心理现象,而非一种关系现象;(ii)关于权利与参与的论述,强调个体患者的自主性以及他们确定自身治疗形式的权利;(iii)关于管理的论述,强调成本与效益之间的关系,其中以家庭为导向的做法被定义为不具有成本效益。所有这三种论述相互关联,以支持对个体化做法的重视。因此,研究结果指向一个悖论:虽然对儿童和受影响家庭成员的需求关注度日益提高,但针对家庭开展综合工作的可能性却很有限。