Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Minnesota Aquatic Invasive Species Research Center, University of Minnesota, 135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Research, 20596 Hwy 7, Hutchinson, MN, 55350, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Dec;22(12):3937-3947. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13377. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
Biological invasions are projected to be the main driver of biodiversity and ecosystem function loss in lakes in the 21st century. However, the extent of these future losses is difficult to quantify because most invasions are recent and confounded by other stressors. In this study, we quantified the outcome of a century-old invasion, the introduction of common carp to North America, to illustrate potential consequences of introducing non-native ecosystem engineers to lakes worldwide. We used the decline in aquatic plant richness and cover as an index of ecological impact across three ecoregions: Great Plains, Eastern Temperate Forests and Northern Forests. Using whole-lake manipulations, we demonstrated that both submersed plant cover and richness declined exponentially as carp biomass increased such that plant cover was reduced to <10% and species richness was halved in lakes in which carp biomass exceeded 190 kg ha . Using catch rates amassed from 2000+ lakes, we showed that carp exceeded this biomass level in 70.6% of Great Plains lakes and 23.3% of Eastern Temperate Forests lakes, but 0% of Northern Forests lakes. Using model selection analysis, we showed that carp was a key driver of plant species richness along with Secchi depth, lake area and human development of lake watersheds. Model parameters showed that carp reduced species richness to a similar degree across lakes of various Secchi depths and surface areas. In regions dominated by carp (e.g., Great Plains), carp had a stronger impact on plant richness than human watershed development. Overall, our analysis shows that the introduction of common carp played a key role in driving a severe reduction in plant cover and richness in a majority of Great Plains lakes and a large portion of Eastern Temperate Forests lakes in North America.
生物入侵预计将成为 21 世纪湖泊生物多样性和生态系统功能丧失的主要驱动因素。然而,由于大多数入侵是最近发生的,并且与其他胁迫因素混杂在一起,因此很难量化这些未来的损失。在这项研究中,我们量化了一个世纪前的入侵事件——鲤鱼被引入北美的结果,以说明向世界湖泊引入非本地生态工程师的潜在后果。我们使用水生植物丰富度和盖度的下降作为生态影响的指标,跨越了三个生态区:大平原、东部温带森林和北方森林。通过全湖操作,我们证明了随着鲤鱼生物量的增加,沉水植物的盖度和丰富度呈指数下降,以至于在鲤鱼生物量超过 190 kg/ha 的湖泊中,植物盖度减少到<10%,物种丰富度减少到一半。利用从 2000 多个湖泊中积累的捕捞率,我们表明在大平原湖泊中有 70.6%和东部温带森林湖泊中有 23.3%的鲤鱼超过了这个生物量水平,但北方森林湖泊中没有。通过模型选择分析,我们表明鲤鱼与塞奇深度、湖泊面积和人类对湖泊流域的开发一起是植物物种丰富度的关键驱动因素。模型参数表明,鲤鱼在各种塞奇深度和表面积的湖泊中对物种丰富度的影响程度相似。在以鲤鱼为主的地区(如大平原),鲤鱼对植物丰富度的影响大于人类流域开发的影响。总的来说,我们的分析表明,鲤鱼的引入在北美大平原的大多数湖泊和东部温带森林的大部分湖泊中,对植物盖度和丰富度的严重减少起到了关键作用。