Akkoc Ali, Aydin Cemil, Kartalmıs Mahir, Topaktas Ramazan, Altin Selcuk, Yilmaz Yakup
Department of Urology, Gazi Yasargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Selahaddin Eyyubi State Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):356-64. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0578.
Urethral stricture disease is still a major problem in men. Many procedures are available for the treatment of urethral strictures; urethral dilatation is one of the oldest. The blind dilatation of urethral strictures may be a difficult and potentially dangerous procedure. The purpose of this study was to describe safe urethral dilatation using amplatz renal dilator and to report outcomes.
From 2010 to 2014, a total of 26 men with primary urethral strictures were managed by urethral dilatation using amplatz renal dilators. The parameters analyzed included presentation of patients, retrograde urethrography (RGU) findings, pre-and postoperative maximum flow rate (Qmax) on uroflowmetry (UF) and post-void residual urine (PVR). Patients were followed-up at 1.6 and 12 months. The technique described in this paper enables such strictures to be safely dilated after endoscopic placement of a suitable guidewire and stylet over which amplatz renal dilators are introduced.
The mean age of the patients was 57.6 (35-72) years. The median stricture length was 0.82 (0.6-1.5)cm. Pre-operative uroflowmetry showed Qmax of 7.00 (4-12) mL/sec and ultrasonography showed PVR of 75.00 (45-195)mL. Postoperatively, Qmax improved to 18.00 (15-22)mL/sec (p<0.001) at 1 month, 17.00 (13-21)mL/sec (p<0.001) at 6 months and 15.00 (12-17)mL/sec (p<0.001) at 12 months. The post-operative PVR values were 22.50 (10-60)mL (p<0.001), 30.00 (10-70)mL (p<0.001) and 30.00 (10-70) mL (p<0.001) at 1.6 12 months, respectively. The median procedure time was 15.00 (12-22) minutes. None of the patients had a recurrence during a 12-month period of follow-up.
Urethral dilatation with amplatz renal dilators avoids the risks associated with blind dilatation techniques. This tecnique is a safe, easy, well-tolerated and cost-effective alternative for treatment of urethral strictures.
尿道狭窄疾病仍是男性面临的一个主要问题。有多种方法可用于治疗尿道狭窄;尿道扩张术是最古老的方法之一。盲目扩张尿道狭窄可能是一项困难且有潜在危险的操作。本研究的目的是描述使用安普拉斯肾造瘘扩张器进行安全的尿道扩张术并报告治疗结果。
2010年至2014年,共有26例原发性尿道狭窄男性患者接受了使用安普拉斯肾造瘘扩张器的尿道扩张术。分析的参数包括患者的临床表现、逆行尿道造影(RGU)结果、尿流率测定(UF)术前和术后的最大尿流率(Qmax)以及排尿后残余尿量(PVR)。患者在术后1个月、6个月和12个月进行随访。本文所述技术能够在内镜下放置合适的导丝和探条后安全地扩张此类狭窄,然后通过导丝和探条引入安普拉斯肾造瘘扩张器。
患者的平均年龄为57.6(35 - 72)岁。狭窄长度的中位数为0.82(0.6 - 1.5)厘米。术前尿流率测定显示Qmax为7.00(4 - 12)毫升/秒,超声检查显示PVR为75.00(45 - 195)毫升。术后,1个月时Qmax改善至18.00(15 - 22)毫升/秒(p<0.001),6个月时为17.00(13 - 21)毫升/秒(p<0.001),12个月时为15.00(12 - 17)毫升/秒(p<0.001)。术后1个月、6个月和12个月的PVR值分别为22.50(10 - 60)毫升(p<0.001)、30.00(10 - 70)毫升(p<0.001)和30.00(10 - 70)毫升(p<0.001)。手术时间的中位数为15.00(12 - 22)分钟。在12个月的随访期内,没有患者复发。
使用安普拉斯肾造瘘扩张器进行尿道扩张可避免盲目扩张技术相关的风险。该技术是一种安全、简便、耐受性良好且经济有效的尿道狭窄治疗替代方法。