Suppr超能文献

高校同性伴侣间的亲密伴侣暴力:倾向评分分析。

Intimate Partner Violence Among Same-Sex Couples in College: A Propensity Score Analysis.

机构信息

1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2019 Apr;34(8):1583-1610. doi: 10.1177/0886260516651628. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive social issue with numerous detrimental effects on individuals, families, and society. Existing research and a social-ecological minority stress framework suggest, as compared with mixed-sex couples, those in same-sex relationships may be at heightened risk for perpetrating and experiencing IPV. Using a U.S. sample of college students ( N = 4,081), this secondary data analysis contrasted the prevalence of five forms of IPV (i.e., physical, sexual, psychological, injury, any type) between those in mixed-sex ( n = 3,960) and those in same-sex ( n = 121) intimate partnerships. Comparative analyses were supplemented with propensity score weighting to help balance members of mixed-sex and same-sex relationships across eight potentially confounding variables (e.g., biological sex, age). Prior to the application of propensity score weighting, results suggested those in same-sex relationships are significantly more likely to perpetrate and/or experience IPV resulting in physical injury. Results from post-weighting analyses retained the significance and magnitude of model estimates. Taken together, results suggest, as compared with mixed-sex couples, U.S. college students in same-sex couples have greater odds of experiencing IPV perpetration and victimization resulting in physical injury, even after accounting for the influence of several potentially confounding variables. Findings support the utility and future application of propensity score analytic techniques in this type of research as well as the importance of recognizing the unique IPV risk and service needs of people in same-sex relationships.

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个普遍存在的社会问题,对个人、家庭和社会都有许多不利影响。现有研究和社会生态少数民族压力框架表明,与异性恋伴侣相比,同性恋伴侣可能面临更高的实施和经历 IPV 的风险。本研究使用美国大学生样本(N=4081),对同性(n=121)和异性(n=3960)亲密关系中的五种 IPV 形式(即身体、性、心理、伤害和任何类型)的流行率进行了对比。比较分析补充了倾向评分加权,以帮助平衡异性恋和同性恋关系成员在八个潜在混杂变量(如生物性别、年龄)上的差异。在应用倾向评分加权之前,结果表明,同性恋关系中的人更有可能实施和/或经历导致身体伤害的 IPV。加权后分析的结果保留了模型估计的显著性和幅度。总的来说,与异性恋伴侣相比,美国大学生中的同性恋伴侣更有可能经历 IPV 的实施和受害,导致身体受伤,即使考虑到几个潜在混杂变量的影响也是如此。研究结果支持在这种类型的研究中使用倾向评分分析技术的有效性和未来应用,以及认识到同性恋关系中人们独特的 IPV 风险和服务需求的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验