• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Generational Differences in Sexual Health Education Experiences Among LGBTQ+ Adolescents and Adults: Findings from a U.S. National Probability Sample.LGBTQ+青少年和成年人性健康教育经历的代际差异:来自美国全国概率样本的结果
J Sex Res. 2024 Oct 30:1-11. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2420312.
2
Sexual Health Education Experiences and Recommendations from the Perspective of LGBTQ+ Youth.LGBTQ+青年视角下的性健康教育经历与建议
J Sex Res. 2025 May;62(4):632-640. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2355564. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
3
What Is the Representation of Sexual and Gender Minority Identities Among Orthopaedic Professionals in the United States?美国矫形外科专业人员中的性少数群体和性别少数群体认同的代表性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1313-1321. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003079. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
4
Intersecting Sexual Identities, Oppressions, and Social Justice Work: Comparing LGBTQ Baby Boomers to Millennials Who Came of Age After the 1980s AIDS Epidemic.交叉的性身份、压迫与社会正义工作:将 LGBTQ 婴儿潮一代与 20 世纪 80 年代艾滋病流行之后成年的千禧一代进行比较
J Soc Issues. 2020 Dec;76(4):971-992. doi: 10.1111/josi.12405. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
5
HIV Prevention Behaviors among LGBTQ+ Adolescents: the Protective Role of LGBTQ+-Inclusive School Resources.LGBTQ+青少年中的HIV预防行为:LGBTQ+包容型学校资源的保护作用。
Prev Sci. 2025 Apr;26(3):438-448. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01799-7. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
6
U.S. medical school admissions and enrollment practices: status of LGBTQ inclusivity.美国医学院招生和入学实践:LGBTQ 包容性现状。
J Osteopath Med. 2021 Jul 14;121(10):787-793. doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0062.
7
Stalking Victimization in LGBTQ Adults: A Brief Report.LGBTQ 成年人中的跟踪受害情况:简要报告。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Mar;35(5-6):1442-1453. doi: 10.1177/0886260517696871. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans.美国的歧视:女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿美国人的经历。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1454-1466. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13229. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
9
Interventional Effects Analysis of Dating Violence and Sexual Assault Victimization in LGBTQ + Adolescents: Quantifying the Roles of Inequities in School and Family Factors.LGBTQ+ 青少年中约会暴力和性侵犯受害的干预效果分析:量化学校和家庭因素中不平等的作用。
Prev Sci. 2023 Jul;24(5):1023-1034. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01562-w. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
How Much Bullying and Discrimination Are Reported by Sexual and Gender Minorities in Orthopaedics?性少数群体和跨性别者在骨科报告的欺凌和歧视有多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1282-1292. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003009. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
"Tell Me": Disclosing Sexual Abuse by Survivors from the LGBTQ+ Community via Social Media.《“告诉我”:LGBTQ+社群幸存者通过社交媒体披露性虐待经历》
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;15(4):435. doi: 10.3390/bs15040435.

本文引用的文献

1
Filling in the Gaps: Updates on Doxycycline Prophylaxis for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections.填补空白:多西环素预防性治疗细菌性性传播感染的最新进展
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae062.
2
Syphilis: A Modern Resurgence.梅毒:现代的再度流行。
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2023 Jun;37(2):195-222. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
The burden of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis in older adults in the United States: A systematic review.美国老年人衣原体、淋病和梅毒的负担:一项系统综述。
Int J STD AIDS. 2023 Apr;34(5):288-298. doi: 10.1177/09564624221149770. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
4
Social support in schools and related outcomes for LGBTQ youth: a scoping review.学校中的社会支持与LGBTQ青年的相关结果:一项范围综述
Discov Educ. 2022;1(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s44217-022-00016-9. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Gender Variations, Generational Effects, and Mental Health of Transgender People in Relation to Timing and Status of Gender Identity Milestones.跨性别者的性别差异、代际效应与心理健康:与性别认同里程碑的时间和状态相关
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2022 Jun;9(2):165-178. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000391. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
6
'They Talked Completely about Straight Couples Only': Schooling, Sexual Violence and Sexual and Gender Minority Youth.“他们只谈论异性恋情侣”:学校教育、性暴力与性少数和性别少数青年
Sex Educ. 2022;22(3):275-288. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2021.1924142. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
7
Adolescents' Receipt of Sex Education in a Nationally Representative Sample, 2011-2019.2011-2019 年全国代表性样本中青少年接受性教育的情况。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Feb;70(2):290-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.08.027. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
8
Sexual Health Information Sources, Needs, and Preferences of Young Adult Sexual Minority Cisgender Women and Non-Binary Individuals Assigned Female at Birth.出生时被指定为女性的年轻成年性少数顺性别女性和非二元性别人士的性健康信息来源、需求及偏好
Sex Res Social Policy. 2021 Sep;18(3):775-787. doi: 10.1007/s13178-020-00501-6. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
Sexual satisfaction with daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among gay and bisexual men at two urban PrEP clinics in the United States: an observational study.美国两家城市艾滋病暴露前预防(PrEP)诊所中男同性恋者和双性恋者对每日口服PrEP的性满意度:一项观察性研究。
Sex Health. 2021 Sep;18(4):319-326. doi: 10.1071/SH20207.
10
Generational differences in sexual behaviour and partnering among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性在性行为和伴侣关系方面的代际差异。
Can J Hum Sex. 2019 Aug;28(2):215-225. doi: 10.3138/cjhs.2019-0014. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

LGBTQ+青少年和成年人性健康教育经历的代际差异:来自美国全国概率样本的结果

Generational Differences in Sexual Health Education Experiences Among LGBTQ+ Adolescents and Adults: Findings from a U.S. National Probability Sample.

作者信息

Brandenburg Dakota, Tatz Corey, Owens Christopher, Hubach Randolph D, Herbenick Debby

机构信息

Center for Sexual Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Indiana University - Bloomington.

Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University - Bloomington.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2024 Oct 30:1-11. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2420312.

DOI:10.1080/00224499.2024.2420312
PMID:39475659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12041313/
Abstract

Few U.S. states require school-based sex education to be representative or inclusive of LGBTQ+ people. Data suggests that adolescents' receipt of necessary topics in sex education has declined in the past 25 years, yet the literature on LGBTQ+ people's sex education experiences in the United States is largely limited to non-probability samples. Data were from a national probability sample of adolescents and adults in the United States. Individuals identifying as LGBTQ+ ( = 818) were asked an open-ended item about the type of sex education they would have liked to have received. Participants were classified into four generational cohorts: Boomer+, Generation X, Millennials, and Generation Z. Inductive content analyses and chi-square tests of independence were used. Having sex education that normalized LGBTQ+ identities was the most reported topic, with Boomer+ being more likely to report this and Generation X being least likely. About one-quarter of respondents indicated they would have liked any type of sex education. Millennials were more likely to report wanting more information on sexual orientation and gender identity and safe sexual practices compared to other cohorts. Nearly one-fourth of respondents indicated their sex education did not need improvement/was unnecessary. Older generations wished their sex education normalized their identities, while Generation Z and Millennials reported wanting more information on safe sex and/or sexual violence prevention. Findings from this study can inform the development of tailored sexual health education programs for LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly considering that current programming may not be different compared to the sex education received by earlier generations.

摘要

美国很少有州要求学校开展具有代表性或包容性的性教育,将 LGBTQ+群体纳入其中。数据表明,在过去25年里,青少年接受性教育中必要主题的比例有所下降,然而,关于美国 LGBTQ+群体性教育经历的文献大多局限于非概率样本。数据来自美国青少年和成年人的全国概率样本。对818名自认为是 LGBTQ+群体的人询问了一个关于他们希望接受的性教育类型的开放性问题。参与者被分为四个代际群体:婴儿潮一代及以后、X一代、千禧一代和Z一代。采用归纳内容分析法和独立性卡方检验。最常被提及的主题是接受使 LGBTQ+身份正常化的性教育,婴儿潮一代及以后群体最有可能提及这一点,而X一代最不可能提及。约四分之一的受访者表示他们希望接受任何类型的性教育。与其他群体相比,千禧一代更有可能表示希望获得更多关于性取向、性别认同和安全性行为的信息。近四分之一的受访者表示他们的性教育不需要改进/没有必要改进。老一辈希望他们接受的性教育能使他们的身份正常化,而Z一代和千禧一代则表示希望获得更多关于安全性行为和/或预防性暴力的信息。这项研究的结果可为为 LGBTQ+群体量身定制性健康教育项目提供参考,特别是考虑到当前的项目可能与前几代人接受的性教育没有什么不同。