Creasy Seth A, Rogers Renee J, Byard Thomas D, Kowalsky Robert J, Jakicic John M
Dept of Health and Physical Activity, Physical Activity and Weight Management Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Jun;13(6):573-8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0419. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
Identifying strategies to increase energy expenditure (EE) may help combat the harmful effects of sedentary behavior. This study examined EE during sitting, standing, and walking.
Participants (N = 74) were randomized to 2 of the following activities: sitting using a laptop computer (SIT-C), sitting watching television (SIT-T), standing watching television (STAND), and walking at a self-selected pace ≤3.0 (mph) (WALK). Each activity lasted 15 minutes with a 3-minute transition period between activities. The experimental conditions were: SIT-C to STAND (N = 18), SIT-T to WALK (N = 18), STAND to SIT-C (N = 20), and WALK to SIT-T (N = 18). EE was measured using indirect calorimetry.
Based on the first activity performed, EE during WALK (55.92 ± 14.19 kcal) was significantly greater than SIT-C (19.63 ± 6.90 kcal), SIT-T (18.66 ± 4.01 kcal), and STAND (21.92 ± 5.08 kcal) (P < .001). Cumulative EE in SIT-T to WALK (74.50 ± 17.88 kcal) and WALK to SIT-T (82.72 ± 21.70 kcal) was significantly greater than EE in SIT-C to STAND (45.38 ± 14.78 kcal) and STAND to SIT-C (45.64 ± 9.69 kcal) (P < .001).
Substituting periods of sitting or standing with walking significantly increases EE, but substituting periods of sitting with standing may not affect EE. Thus, the potential benefits of standing as opposed to sitting need further investigation beyond the role of EE.
确定增加能量消耗(EE)的策略可能有助于对抗久坐行为的有害影响。本研究考察了坐着、站立和行走过程中的能量消耗。
参与者(N = 74)被随机分配到以下两种活动中:使用笔记本电脑坐着(SIT-C)、坐着看电视(SIT-T)、站着看电视(STAND)以及以≤3.0英里/小时的自选速度行走(WALK)。每项活动持续15分钟,活动之间有3分钟的过渡时间。实验条件为:从SIT-C到STAND(N = 18)、从SIT-T到WALK(N = 18)、从STAND到SIT-C(N = 20)以及从WALK到SIT-T(N = 18)。使用间接测热法测量能量消耗。
基于所进行的第一项活动,WALK期间的能量消耗(55.92 ± 14.19千卡)显著高于SIT-C(19.63 ± 6.90千卡)、SIT-T(18.66 ± 4.01千卡)和STAND(21.92 ± 5.08千卡)(P < .001)。从SIT-T到WALK(74.50 ± 17.88千卡)以及从WALK到SIT-T(82.72 ± 21.70千卡)的累积能量消耗显著高于从SIT-C到STAND(45.38 ± 14.78千卡)以及从STAND到SIT-C(45.64 ± 9.69千卡)(P < .001)。
用行走替代久坐或站立时段可显著增加能量消耗,但用站立替代久坐时段可能不会影响能量消耗。因此,站立相对于坐着的潜在益处,除了能量消耗的作用外,还需要进一步研究。