Schueler Beth E, West Martin R
B eth E. S chueler is a doctoral student at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. M artin R. W est is an associate professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. William Howell and Paul Peterson collaborated with Martin West to design the survey experiments presented in this paper and offered valuable input into the analysis. The authors also thank Richard Murnane, John Willett, Matthew Kraft, Christopher Jencks, Hunter Gehlbach, Greg Duncan, Amitabh Chandra, and participants in the Harvard University Inequality & Social Policy Proseminar and the Harvard Graduate School of Education Quantitative Methods for Causal Inference course for helpful comments and discussions. Beth Schueler's work on this paper has been supported by funding from the Harvard University Multidisciplinary Program in Inequality & Social Policy and the Bradley Foundation. The collection of survey data was supported by a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to Paul E. Peterson and M. R. W.
Public Opin Q. 2016 Spring;80(1):90-113. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfv047. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
This study examines the role of information in shaping public opinion in the context of support for education spending. While there is broad public support for increasing government funding for public schools, Americans tend to underestimate what is currently spent. We embed a series of experiments in a nationally representative survey administered in 2012 ( = 2,993) to examine whether informing citizens about current levels of education spending alters public opinion about whether funding should increase. Providing information on per-pupil spending in a respondent's local school district reduces the probability that he or she will express support for increasing spending by 22 percentage points on average. Informing respondents about state-average teacher salaries similarly depresses support for salary increases. These effects are larger among respondents who underestimate per-pupil spending and teacher salaries by a greater amount, consistent with the idea that the observed changes in opinion are driven, at least in part, by informational effects, as opposed to priming alone.
本研究探讨了在支持教育支出的背景下,信息在塑造公众舆论方面所起的作用。虽然公众广泛支持增加政府对公立学校的资金投入,但美国人往往低估了当前的支出水平。我们在2012年进行的一项具有全国代表性的调查(样本量(n = 2993))中嵌入了一系列实验,以检验向公民通报当前教育支出水平是否会改变公众对资金是否应增加的看法。提供受访者所在当地学区的人均支出信息后,他或她表示支持增加支出的概率平均降低了22个百分点。同样,向受访者通报该州教师平均工资也会抑制对提高工资的支持。在那些对人均支出和教师工资低估幅度更大的受访者中,这些影响更为显著,这与以下观点一致,即观察到的观点变化至少部分是由信息效应驱动的,而非仅仅是启动效应。