Adesope Oluwaseyi, Ituk Unyime, Habib Ashraf S
From the Duke University Medical Center (OA, ASH); and University of Iowa (UI).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;33(10):731-42. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000462.
Wound infiltration with local anaesthetics has been investigated as a potentially useful method for providing analgesia after caesarean delivery, but the literature is inconclusive.
The objective is to assess the efficacy of local anaesthetic wound infiltration in reducing pain scores and opioid consumption in women undergoing caesarean delivery.
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-analyses.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) until December 2015.
Randomised controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of local anaesthetic wound infiltration using an infusion or single injection technique for postcaesarean section analgesia.
A total of 21 studies were included in the final analysis (11 studies using an infusion technique and 10 studies using single infiltration). Local anaesthetic wound infiltration significantly decreased opioid consumption at 24 h [mean difference -9.69 mg morphine equivalents, 95% confidence interval (CI), -14.85 to -4.52] and pain scores after 24 h at rest (mean difference -0.36, 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.14) and on movement (mean difference -0.61, 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.03). Subgroup analysis did not suggest a difference in primary outcomes between infusions and single infiltration. Opioid consumption was reduced in patients who did not receive intrathecal morphine but not in those who received intrathecal morphine, although there were very little data in patients receiving intrathecal morphine. Pain scores at rest and on movement at 24 h were reduced with catheter placement below the fascia but not above the fascia. There were no statistically significant reductions in nausea, vomiting or pruritus with local anaesthetic infiltration.
Local anaesthetic wound infiltration reduces postoperative opioid consumption but had minimal effect on pain scores and did not reduce opioid-related side-effects in women who had undergone delivery by caesarean section. The review is limited by a paucity of studies using intrathecal morphine and by the indirect comparisons performed for subgroup analyses.
局部麻醉剂伤口浸润已被研究作为剖宫产术后提供镇痛的一种潜在有用方法,但文献尚无定论。
评估局部麻醉剂伤口浸润在降低剖宫产妇女疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗量方面的疗效。
采用荟萃分析的随机对照试验系统评价。
截至2015年12月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)。
评估使用输注或单次注射技术进行局部麻醉剂伤口浸润用于剖宫产术后镇痛疗效的随机对照试验。
最终分析共纳入21项研究(11项研究使用输注技术,10项研究使用单次浸润)。局部麻醉剂伤口浸润在24小时时显著降低了阿片类药物消耗量[平均差异-9.69毫克吗啡当量,95%置信区间(CI),-14.85至-4.52],并在24小时静息时(平均差异-0.36,95%CI,-0.58至-0.14)和活动时(平均差异-0.61,95%CI,-1.19至-0.03)降低了疼痛评分。亚组分析未提示输注和单次浸润在主要结局上存在差异。未接受鞘内吗啡的患者阿片类药物消耗量降低,但接受鞘内吗啡的患者未降低,尽管接受鞘内吗啡的患者数据极少。导管置于筋膜下方时,24小时静息和活动时的疼痛评分降低,但置于筋膜上方时未降低。局部麻醉剂浸润在恶心、呕吐或瘙痒方面无统计学显著降低。
局部麻醉剂伤口浸润可降低术后阿片类药物消耗量,但对疼痛评分影响极小,且未降低剖宫产妇女与阿片类药物相关的副作用。本综述受到使用鞘内吗啡的研究较少以及亚组分析进行间接比较的限制。