• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(Robot-assisted radical cystectomy)后局部、远处和非典型复发的影响因素:310 例患者的详细分析。

Factors Impacting the Occurrence of Local, Distant and Atypical Recurrences after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Detailed Analysis of 310 Patients.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital (DPN), Bern, Switzerland; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.

Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital (DPN), Bern, Switzerland; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Urol. 2016 Nov;196(5):1390-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.101. Epub 2016 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.101
PMID:27259653
Abstract

PURPOSE

Peritoneal carcinomatosis and extrapelvic lymph node metastases can be seen following robot-assisted radical cystectomy. In an attempt to identify predictors of these atypical metastases we report a detailed analysis of patients treated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy in whom recurrences developed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 310 patients underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer from 2001 to 2015. Descriptive statistics were used to compare baseline variables between patients without recurrence and those with local, distant or atypical recurrence. Univariate and multivariable regression models were used to assess the effect of variables on oncologic outcomes including recurrence location.

RESULTS

At a median followup of 24 months (IQR 14-51) 81 patients had recurrence. On multivariable analysis tumor classification, lymphovascular invasion, estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/minute/1.73 m and perioperative blood transfusion were significantly associated with any recurrence. Specific analyses showed that tumor and nodal classification, lymphovascular invasion and positive surgical margins were associated with all 3 recurrence locations (all p <0.05). Previous abdominal surgery was protective against atypical recurrences (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13-0.95, p = 0.04). Estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/minute/1.73 m and perioperative blood transfusion conferred a higher risk of distant or atypical recurrence but not of local recurrence (all p <0.05). Operative time and previous pelvic radiotherapy were not associated with any recurrence locations.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of distant recurrences, peritoneal carcinomatosis and extrapelvic lymph node metastases after robot-assisted radical cystectomy did not significantly differ and were mainly dictated by pathological tumor characteristics. Results suggest that the risk of atypical recurrence is chiefly influenced by tumor biology rather than surgical aspects.

摘要

目的

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术可导致腹膜癌病和盆腔外淋巴结转移。为了确定这些非典型转移的预测因素,我们报告了一项对接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗且复发的患者的详细分析。

材料和方法

2001 年至 2015 年,共有 310 例膀胱癌患者接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术。使用描述性统计比较无复发患者和局部、远处或非典型复发患者的基线变量。使用单变量和多变量回归模型评估变量对包括复发部位在内的肿瘤学结果的影响。

结果

中位随访 24 个月(IQR 14-51)时,81 例患者复发。多变量分析显示,肿瘤分类、脉管侵犯、估计肾小球滤过率小于 60ml/min/1.73m 和围手术期输血与任何复发显著相关。具体分析显示,肿瘤和淋巴结分类、脉管侵犯和阳性切缘与所有 3 种复发部位均相关(均 P<0.05)。既往腹部手术可预防非典型复发(HR 0.36,95%CI 0.13-0.95,P=0.04)。估计肾小球滤过率小于 60ml/min/1.73m 和围手术期输血增加远处或非典型复发的风险,但不增加局部复发的风险(均 P<0.05)。手术时间和既往盆腔放疗与任何复发部位均无关。

结论

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后远处复发、腹膜癌病和盆腔外淋巴结转移的预测因素无显著差异,主要由病理肿瘤特征决定。结果表明,非典型复发的风险主要受肿瘤生物学影响,而非手术方面。

相似文献

1
Factors Impacting the Occurrence of Local, Distant and Atypical Recurrences after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Detailed Analysis of 310 Patients.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(Robot-assisted radical cystectomy)后局部、远处和非典型复发的影响因素:310 例患者的详细分析。
J Urol. 2016 Nov;196(5):1390-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.101. Epub 2016 May 31.
2
Recurrence patterns after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.膀胱癌开放及机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的复发模式。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
3
Rates and Patterns of Recurrences and Survival Outcomes after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的复发率和生存结局:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
J Urol. 2021 Feb;205(2):407-413. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001380. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
4
Early Recurrence Patterns Following Totally Intracorporeal Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the EAU Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) Scientific Working Group.完全经体腔机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术术后早期复发模式:EAU 机器人泌尿外科分会(ERUS)科学工作组的研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):723-726. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Ten-Year Oncologic Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术 10 年肿瘤学结果:国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟研究结果。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):927-935. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000386. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
6
Atypical oncologic failure after laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy at a single institution.单中心单机构腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的非典型肿瘤失败。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul;25(7):1385-1392. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01677-y. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
7
Port-site metastasis and atypical recurrences after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC): an updated comprehensive and systematic review of current evidences.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)后的切口转移和非典型复发:当前证据的最新全面系统综述
J Robot Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):805-812. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01062-x. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
8
Early Oncologic Failure after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后早期肿瘤学失败:国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1427-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.048. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
9
Oncologic outcomes for lymph node-positive urothelial carcinoma patients treated with robot assisted radical cystectomy: with mean follow-up of 3.5 years.淋巴结阳性的尿路上皮癌患者接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学结果:平均随访 3.5 年。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1621-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
10
Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的手术切缘状态:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A review and meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy in elderly bladder cancer patients.一项综述与荟萃分析:比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在老年膀胱癌患者中的疗效
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 22;19(1):168. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02323-3.
2
Incidence, Timing, and Pattern of Atypical Recurrence after Minimally Invasive Surgery for Urothelial Carcinoma.尿路上皮癌微创手术后非典型复发的发生率、时间及模式
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 17;13(12):3537. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123537.
3
The effect of different timing of blood transfusion on oncological outcomes of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
不同输血时机对膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术患者肿瘤学结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 30;13:1223592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1223592. eCollection 2023.
4
Intra-corporeal robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative and long-term survival outcomes and recurrence patterns.体内机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术:一项倾向评分匹配分析,比较围手术期和长期生存结果及复发模式。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug;26(8):1514-1523. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01939-3. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Clinical Significance of Pre-treated Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Management of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.预处理中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在尿路上皮癌治疗中的临床意义:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2019 Dec 16;9:1365. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01365. eCollection 2019.
6
Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup.开放与机器人根治性膀胱切除术术后复发、无进展和总生存的预测因素:RAZOR 试验的 3 年随访分析。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):522-529. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000565. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
Concomitant carcinoma in situ may not be a prognostic factor for patients with bladder cancer following radical cystectomy: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性膀胱切除术后伴原位癌的膀胱癌患者预后可能不是一个预后因素:一项符合 PRISMA 原则的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):129-142. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02738-2. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
Does robotic radical cystectomy impede oncological outcome in bladder cancer patients?机器人根治性膀胱切除术是否会影响膀胱癌患者的肿瘤学结局?
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Dec;7(Suppl 6):S744-S746. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.16.
9
Incisional hernia after cystectomy: incidence, risk factors and anthropometric predisposition.膀胱切除术后切口疝:发生率、危险因素及人体测量学易感性
Can J Urol. 2018 Dec;25(6):9573-9578.
10
Semi-competing risk model to predict perioperative and oncologic outcomes after radical cystectomy.预测根治性膀胱切除术后围手术期和肿瘤学结局的半竞争风险模型。
Ther Adv Urol. 2018 Aug 29;10(11):317-326. doi: 10.1177/1756287218791412. eCollection 2018 Nov.