• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup.开放与机器人根治性膀胱切除术术后复发、无进展和总生存的预测因素:RAZOR 试验的 3 年随访分析。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):522-529. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000565. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
2
Ten-Year Oncologic Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术 10 年肿瘤学结果:国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟研究结果。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):927-935. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000386. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Rates and Patterns of Recurrences and Survival Outcomes after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的复发率和生存结局:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
J Urol. 2021 Feb;205(2):407-413. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001380. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
4
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的比较(RAZOR):一项开放标签、随机、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2525-2536. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-6.
5
Perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder: Results of a propensity score matched comparison with open cohort from a single-centre series.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合完全腔内新膀胱术的围手术期和中期肿瘤学结果:来自单中心系列的倾向评分匹配与开放队列比较的结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;44(9):1432-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
6
Oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy with minimum 5-year follow-up: the Roswell Park cancer institute experience.根治性膀胱切除术机器人辅助治疗后 5 年以上的肿瘤学结果:罗切斯特大学癌症研究所的经验。
Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):920-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
7
Oncological Outcomes in Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Comparison Between Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Approaches.接受根治性膀胱切除术治疗的膀胱癌患者的肿瘤学结局:开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术方法的比较。
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):783-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0652. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy: Over 10 years of the Mayo Clinic Experience.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术:梅奥诊所超过10年的经验
Urol Oncol. 2019 Dec;37(12):862-869. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
9
Randomized Trial Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Oncologic Outcomes.随机对照试验比较开放性根治性膀胱切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD): a multi-center study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)联合完全腔内尿流改道术(ICUD)的长期肿瘤学结果:一项多中心研究。
World J Urol. 2020 Apr;38(4):837-843. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02842-3. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Demonstrating the non-inferiority of robotic radical cystectomy for cT3-cT4 urothelial carcinoma in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.新辅助化疗时代机器人根治性膀胱切除术治疗cT3 - cT4期尿路上皮癌的非劣效性:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 12;19(1):596. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02771-x.
2
Safety of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Real-World Analysis Using the National Clinical Database in Japan.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的安全性:一项使用日本国家临床数据库的真实世界分析。
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71109. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71109.
3
Defining new radiological patterns to improve classification of Bosniak III and IV cystic renal masses.定义新的放射学模式以改善博斯尼亚克III级和IV级囊性肾肿块的分类。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05092-7.
4
Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy in a Multicenter Cohort Study: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.多中心队列研究中机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17617-x.
5
Comment on: "A review and meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy in elderly bladder cancer patients".评论:“一项综述与荟萃分析:比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在老年膀胱癌患者中的疗效”
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 6;19(1):199. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02376-4.
6
A review and meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy in elderly bladder cancer patients.一项综述与荟萃分析:比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在老年膀胱癌患者中的疗效
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 22;19(1):168. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02323-3.
7
Comparison of Complication and Readmission Rates Between Robot-Assisted and Open Radical Cystectomy: Results From the Randomized RAZOR Clinical Trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的并发症和再入院率比较:随机RAZOR临床试验的结果
J Urol. 2025 Jun;213(6):684-692. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004497. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
8
Radical Cystectomy with Elective Indication to Cutaneous Ureterostomy: Single-Center Comparative Analysis Between Open and Robotic Surgery in Frail Patients.根治性膀胱切除术并选择性行皮肤输尿管造口术:老年体弱患者开放手术与机器人手术的单中心对比分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2025 May-Jun;51(3). doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0556.
9
Oncological outcomes of organ-sparing cystectomy versus standard radical cystectomy in male patients diagnosed with bladder cancer.男性膀胱癌患者行保留器官的膀胱切除术与标准根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学结局。
World J Urol. 2024 Nov 2;42(1):619. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05329-y.
10
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的疗效比较
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):517-527. doi: 10.1111/bju.16565. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的比较(RAZOR):一项开放标签、随机、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2525-2536. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-6.
2
A Tutorial on Multilevel Survival Analysis: Methods, Models and Applications.多级生存分析教程:方法、模型与应用
Int Stat Rev. 2017 Aug;85(2):185-203. doi: 10.1111/insr.12214. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
3
Early Recurrence Patterns Following Totally Intracorporeal Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the EAU Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) Scientific Working Group.完全经体腔机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术术后早期复发模式:EAU 机器人泌尿外科分会(ERUS)科学工作组的研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):723-726. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
4
Factors Impacting the Occurrence of Local, Distant and Atypical Recurrences after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Detailed Analysis of 310 Patients.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(Robot-assisted radical cystectomy)后局部、远处和非典型复发的影响因素:310 例患者的详细分析。
J Urol. 2016 Nov;196(5):1390-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.101. Epub 2016 May 31.
5
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients: A comparison of two high-volume referral centers.膀胱癌患者机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结果:两个高容量转诊中心的比较
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;42(11):1736-1743. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.254. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
Oncologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results of a High-Volume Robotic Center.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学结果:高容量机器人手术中心的结果
J Endourol. 2016 Jan;30(1):75-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0482. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
7
Long-term oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的长期肿瘤学结果:国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):721-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 May 16.
8
Recurrence patterns after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.膀胱癌开放及机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的复发模式。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
9
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes.机器人和腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:长期肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

开放与机器人根治性膀胱切除术术后复发、无进展和总生存的预测因素:RAZOR 试验的 3 年随访分析。

Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.

出版信息

J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):522-529. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000565. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000000565
PMID:31549935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7487279/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The RAZOR (Randomized Open versus Robotic Cystectomy) trial revealed noninferior 2-year progression-free survival for robotic radical cystectomy. This update was performed with extended followup for 3 years to determine potential differences between the approaches. We also report 3-year overall survival and sought to identify factors predicting recurrence, and progression-free and overall survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the per protocol population of 302 patients from the RAZOR study. Cumulative recurrence was estimated using nonbladder cancer death as the competing risk event and the Gray test was applied to assess significance in differences. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log rank test. Predictors of outcomes were determined by Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Estimated progression-free survival at 36 months was 68.4% (95% CI 60.1-75.3) and 65.4% (95% CI 56.8-72.7) in the robotic and open groups, respectively (p=0.600). At 36 months overall survival was 73.9% (95% CI 65.5-80.5) and 68.5% (95% CI 59.8-75.7) in the robotic and open groups, respectively (p=0.334). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence rates of recurrence (p=0.802). Patient age greater than 70 years, poor performance status and major complications were significant predictors of 36-month progression-free survival. Stage and positive margins were significant predictors of recurrence, and progression-free and overall survival. Surgical approach was not a significant predictor of any outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis showed no difference in recurrence, 3-year progression-free survival or 3-year overall survival for robotic vs open radical cystectomy. It provides important prospective data on the oncologic efficacy of robotic radical cystectomy and high level data for patient counseling.

摘要

目的

RAZOR(随机开放与机器人根治性膀胱切除术)试验显示,机器人根治性膀胱切除术在 2 年内无进展生存率无差异。本研究进行了扩展随访 3 年,以确定两种方法之间的潜在差异。我们还报告了 3 年总生存率,并试图确定预测复发、无进展生存率和总生存率的因素。

材料和方法

我们分析了 RAZOR 研究中 302 名患者的方案人群。使用非膀胱癌死亡作为竞争风险事件来估计累积复发率,并应用 Gray 检验评估差异的显著性。无进展生存率和总生存率采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计,并采用对数秩检验进行比较。采用 Cox 比例风险分析确定结局的预测因素。

结果

36 个月时,机器人组和开放组的无进展生存率分别为 68.4%(95%CI 60.1-75.3)和 65.4%(95%CI 56.8-72.7)(p=0.600)。36 个月时,机器人组和开放组的总生存率分别为 73.9%(95%CI 65.5-80.5)和 68.5%(95%CI 59.8-75.7)(p=0.334)。两组累积复发率无显著差异(p=0.802)。患者年龄大于 70 岁、一般状况差和主要并发症是 36 个月无进展生存率的显著预测因素。分期和阳性切缘是复发、无进展生存率和总生存率的显著预测因素。手术方式不是任何结局的显著预测因素。

结论

本分析显示,机器人与开放根治性膀胱切除术在复发、3 年无进展生存率或 3 年总生存率方面无差异。它提供了机器人根治性膀胱切除术在肿瘤学疗效方面的重要前瞻性数据,并为患者咨询提供了高级别的数据。