Fox Annie B, Hamilton Alison B, Frayne Susan M, Wiltsey-Stirman Shannon, Bean-Mayberry Bevanne, Carney Diane, Di Leone Brooke A L, Gierisch Jennifer M, Goldstein Karen M, Romodan Yasmin, Sadler Anne G, Yano Elizabeth M, Yee Ellen F, Vogt Dawne
Dr. Fox: Research Health Science Specialist, Women's Health Sciences Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA. Dr. Hamilton: Research Health Scientist, HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. Dr. Frayne: Professor of Medicine, VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, and Division of General Medical Disciplines and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Dr. Wiltsey-Stirman: Research Psychologist, Women's Health Sciences Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, and Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. Dr. Bean-Mayberry: VA HSR&D Investigator and Staff Physician, VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, and Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, West Los Angeles, CA. Ms. Carney: Research Health Science Specialist, VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA. Dr. Di Leone: Postdoctoral Researcher, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Gierisch: Assistant Professor, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, and Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Dr. Goldstein: Assistant Professor, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016 Spring;36(2):96-103. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000073.
Although providing culturally sensitive health care is vitally important, there is little consensus regarding the most effective strategy for implementing cultural competence trainings in the health care setting. Evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI), which involves adapting evidence-based practices to meet local needs, may improve uptake and effectiveness of a variety of health care innovations. Yet, to our knowledge, EBQI has not yet been applied to cultural competence training. To evaluate whether EBQI could enhance the impact of an evidence-based training intended to improve veterans affairs health care staff gender sensitivity and knowledge (Caring for Women Veterans; CWV), we compared the reach and effectiveness of EBQI delivery versus standard web-based implementation strategies of CWV and assessed barriers and facilitators to EBQI implementation.
Workgroups at four diverse veterans affairs health care sites were randomized to either an EBQI or standard web-based implementation condition (SI). All EBQI sites selected a group-based implementation strategy. Employees (N = 84) completed pretraining and posttraining assessments of gender sensitivity and knowledge, and focus groups/interviews were conducted with leadership and staff before and after implementation.
Reach of CWV was greater in the EBQI condition versus the SI condition. Whereas both gender sensitivity and knowledge improved in the EBQI condition, only gender sensitivity improved in the SI condition. Qualitative analyses revealed that the EBQI approach was well received, although a number of barriers were identified.
Findings suggest that EBQI can enhance the uptake and effectiveness of employee trainings. However, the decision to pursue EBQI must be informed by a consideration of available resources.
尽管提供具有文化敏感性的医疗保健至关重要,但对于在医疗保健环境中实施文化能力培训的最有效策略,几乎没有达成共识。循证质量改进(EBQI),即采用循证实践以满足当地需求,可能会提高各种医疗保健创新的接受度和有效性。然而,据我们所知,EBQI尚未应用于文化能力培训。为了评估EBQI是否能增强旨在提高退伍军人事务医疗保健人员性别敏感度和知识的循证培训(关爱女性退伍军人;CWV)的影响,我们比较了EBQI实施方式与CWV基于网络的标准实施策略的覆盖范围和有效性,并评估了EBQI实施的障碍和促进因素。
四个不同的退伍军人事务医疗保健站点的工作组被随机分配到EBQI或基于网络的标准实施条件(SI)。所有EBQI站点都选择了基于小组的实施策略。员工(N = 84)完成了性别敏感度和知识的培训前和培训后评估,并在实施前后对领导和员工进行了焦点小组访谈。
与SI条件相比,EBQI条件下CWV的覆盖范围更大。在EBQI条件下,性别敏感度和知识都有所提高,而在SI条件下只有性别敏感度有所提高。定性分析表明,EBQI方法受到了好评,尽管也发现了一些障碍。
研究结果表明,EBQI可以提高员工培训的接受度和有效性。然而,在决定采用EBQI时,必须考虑可用资源。