• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对“安吉丽娜·朱莉效应” 对西澳大利亚州珀斯单一家族性癌症项目影响的回顾性探究

A Retrospective Exploration of the Impact of the 'Angelina Jolie Effect' on the Single State-Wide Familial Cancer Program in Perth, Western Australia.

作者信息

Freedman Rebecca, Mountain Helen, Karina Dian, Schofield Lyn

机构信息

Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Level 4 Agnes Walsh House, Bagot Road, Subiaco, Western Australia, 6008, Australia.

Western Australian Familial Cancer Registry, Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Bagot Road, Subiaco, Australia.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):52-62. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9982-5. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-016-9982-5
PMID:27265404
Abstract

Global media has the power to influence the ways the public engage with health services. On May 14th 2013, Angelina Jolie published an article in the New York Times magazine, outlining her decision to undergo BRCA mutation testing due to a family history of cancer; then proceed with a mastectomy. The article evoked significant interest from the media and the public. During the months that followed, the Familial Cancer Program (FCP) at Genetic Services of Western Australia (GSWA) experienced a significant increase in referrals and enquiries. Resources were overstretched and it became clear we needed to adjust work practices to manage the escalating numbers. New strategies were devised to cope with the influx of enquiries, albeit without the benefit of additional resources. We conducted an audit of referrals to the FCP made between January 2012 and December 2014. This included a comparison of the months prior to and following the New York Times article. The aim of the audit was to quantify the impact of the "Angelina Jolie effect" on referrals to the FCP. Whilst the increased awareness of the role of genetic services in risk assessment and testing for familial breast and ovarian cancer was considered positive, pre-referral risk assessment at the primary health level to evaluate the appropriateness of their patients for referral could have been helpful. Potentially, many inappropriate referrals to FCP may have been avoided with primary health evaluation thus lessening the burden on our service and preventing unnecessary worry in well women who possessed minimal family history or risk factors. It is important to understand the factors driving the uptake of risk reduction activities, particularly if engagement with a genetics service is considered part of that pathway. Continued education about cancer risk due to family history, individual features and awareness surrounding genetic testing criteria, costs and availability is required for both the public and health professionals.

摘要

全球媒体有能力影响公众与医疗服务机构互动的方式。2013年5月14日,安吉丽娜·朱莉在《纽约时报》杂志上发表了一篇文章,讲述了由于家族癌症病史,她决定接受BRCA基因突变检测,然后进行乳房切除术。这篇文章引起了媒体和公众的极大兴趣。在随后的几个月里,西澳大利亚遗传服务机构(GSWA)的家族癌症项目(FCP)收到的转诊和咨询显著增加。资源不堪重负,很明显我们需要调整工作方式来应对不断增加的数量。我们制定了新策略来应对咨询量的涌入,尽管没有额外资源的支持。我们对2012年1月至2014年12月期间转诊至FCP的情况进行了审计。这包括对比《纽约时报》文章发表之前和之后的月份。审计的目的是量化“安吉丽娜·朱莉效应”对转诊至FCP的影响。虽然人们对遗传服务在家族性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险评估及检测中的作用认识有所提高被认为是积极的,但在初级卫生保健层面进行转诊前风险评估以评估患者转诊的适宜性可能会有所帮助。通过初级卫生保健评估,可能避免许多不适当的转诊至FCP的情况,从而减轻我们服务的负担,并防止家族病史或风险因素极小的健康女性产生不必要的担忧。了解推动采取降低风险活动的因素很重要,特别是如果与遗传服务机构的接触被视为该途径的一部分。公众和卫生专业人员都需要持续接受关于家族病史导致的癌症风险、个体特征以及围绕基因检测标准、成本和可及性的认识方面的教育。

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Exploration of the Impact of the 'Angelina Jolie Effect' on the Single State-Wide Familial Cancer Program in Perth, Western Australia.对“安吉丽娜·朱莉效应” 对西澳大利亚州珀斯单一家族性癌症项目影响的回顾性探究
J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):52-62. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9982-5. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
2
The Impact of Angelina Jolie (AJ)'s Story on Genetic Referral and Testing at an Academic Cancer Centre in Canada.安吉丽娜·朱莉(AJ)的故事对加拿大一家学术癌症中心的基因转诊与检测的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2016 Dec;25(6):1309-1316. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9973-6. Epub 2016 May 26.
3
The Angelina Jolie effect: how high celebrity profile can have a major impact on provision of cancer related services.安吉丽娜·朱莉效应:名人的高知名度如何对癌症相关服务的提供产生重大影响。
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 19;16(5):442. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0442-6.
4
Changes of Socio-demographic data of clients seeking genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer due to the "Angelina Jolie Effect".因“安吉丽娜·朱莉效应”前来进行遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因咨询的客户社会人口学数据的变化。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 8;16:436. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2472-1.
5
Trends and timing of risk-reducing mastectomy uptake in unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚未受影响的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 携带者中降低风险的乳房切除术接受率的趋势和时间。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):1900-1906. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.248. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Global celebrities' effect on health awareness among Jordanians: A study using the case of Angelina Jolie.全球名人对约旦人健康意识的影响:一项以安吉丽娜·朱莉为例的研究。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Oct;28(5):1021-1028. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1154. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
7
The Angelina effect: immediate reach, grasp, and impact of going public.安吉丽娜效应:上市的即时影响力。
Genet Med. 2014 Jul;16(7):516-21. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.181. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
8
Hereditary breast cancer: an update on risk assessment and genetic testing in 2015.遗传性乳腺癌:2015年风险评估与基因检测最新进展
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;213(2):161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
9
Risk-reducing mastectomy rates in the US: a closer examination of the Angelina Jolie effect.美国降低风险的乳房切除术率:对安吉丽娜·朱莉效应的更深入研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Sep;171(2):435-442. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4824-9. Epub 2018 May 28.
10
Do celebrity endorsements matter? Observational study of BRCA gene testing and mastectomy rates after Angelina Jolie's New York Times editorial.名人代言有影响吗?对安吉丽娜·朱莉在《纽约时报》发表社论后BRCA基因检测和乳房切除术率的观察性研究。
BMJ. 2016 Dec 14;355:i6357. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6357.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of Localized Cancer Risk Reduction Interventions Among Individuals at Average or High Risk for Cancer.本地化癌症风险降低干预措施在癌症平均或高风险个体中的可接受性。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 Apr;12(4):271-282. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0435. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
2
Different Patterns of Risk Reducing Decisions in Affected or Unaffected BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers.不同风险降低决策模式在受影响或未受影响的 BRCA 致病性变异携带者中的体现。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;51(1):280-288. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.079. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
High-Risk Palliative Care Patients' Knowledge and Attitudes about Hereditary Cancer Testing and DNA Banking.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing Psychological Distress in a Genetic Counseling Consultation for Breast Cancer.减轻乳腺癌遗传咨询中的心理困扰
J Genet Couns. 2003 Jun;12(3):243-64. doi: 10.1023/A:1023284219871.
2
The Angelina Jolie effect: how high celebrity profile can have a major impact on provision of cancer related services.安吉丽娜·朱莉效应:名人的高知名度如何对癌症相关服务的提供产生重大影响。
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 19;16(5):442. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0442-6.
3
Genetic testing and familial implications in breast-ovarian cancer families.
高危姑息治疗患者对遗传性癌症检测和DNA库的知识与态度。
J Genet Couns. 2018 Aug;27(4):834-843. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0181-9. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
4
Trends in Use of Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in a Context of Celebrity Decisions and Media Coverage: An Observational Study in the United States and Australia.在名人决策和媒体报道背景下,风险降低乳房切除术的使用趋势:美国和澳大利亚的观察性研究。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2682-2695. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12774. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
5
Influence of the Angelina Jolie Announcement and Insurance Reimbursement on Practice Patterns for Hereditary Breast Cancer.安吉丽娜·朱莉的声明及保险赔付对遗传性乳腺癌诊疗模式的影响
J Breast Cancer. 2017 Jun;20(2):203-207. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2017.20.2.203. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
乳腺癌-卵巢癌家族中的基因检测及家族影响
Maturitas. 2014 Aug;78(4):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 9.
4
The Angelina Jolie effect.安吉丽娜·朱莉效应。
Med J Aust. 2013 Nov 18;199(10):646. doi: 10.5694/mja13.11218.
5
BRCA1 and BRCA2 - update and implications on the genetics of breast cancer: a clinical perspective.BRCA1和BRCA2——乳腺癌遗传学的最新进展及影响:临床视角
Clin Genet. 2014 Jan;85(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/cge.12291. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
6
Media coverage and public reaction to a celebrity cancer diagnosis.媒体对名人癌症诊断的报道和公众反应。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Mar;33(1):80-5. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq052. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
7
Addition of pathology and biomarker information significantly improves the performance of the Manchester scoring system for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.病理和生物标志物信息的添加显著提高了用于 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 检测的曼彻斯特评分系统的性能。
J Med Genet. 2009 Dec;46(12):811-7. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.067850. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
8
Cancer genetics service interest in women with a limited family history of breast cancer.
J Genet Couns. 2009 Aug;18(4):339-49. doi: 10.1007/s10897-009-9224-1. Epub 2009 May 14.
9
Use of breast cancer screening and treatment services by Australian women aged 25-44 years following Kylie Minogue's breast cancer diagnosis.凯莉·米洛被诊断出患有乳腺癌后,澳大利亚25至44岁女性对乳腺癌筛查和治疗服务的使用情况。
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;37(6):1326-32. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn090. Epub 2008 May 30.
10
Health behaviors and psychological distress in women initiating BRCA1/2 genetic testing: comparison with control population.启动BRCA1/2基因检测的女性的健康行为与心理困扰:与对照人群的比较。
J Genet Couns. 2008 Aug;17(4):314-26. doi: 10.1007/s10897-008-9150-7. Epub 2008 May 15.