Pant Narayan Dutt, Poudyal Nimesh, Bhattacharya Shyamal Kumar
Department of Microbiology, Grande International Hospital, Dhapasi, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Department of Microbiology, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2016 Jun 7;35(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0054-0.
Water-related diseases are of great concern in developing countries like Nepal. Every year, there are countless morbidity and mortality due to the consumption of unsafe drinking water. Recently, there have been increased uses of bottled drinking water in an assumption that the bottled water is safer than the tap water and its use will help to protect from water-related diseases. So, the main objective of this study was to analyze the bacteriological quality of bottled drinking water and that of municipal tap water.
A total of 100 samples (76 tap water and 24 bottled water) were analyzed for bacteriological quality and pH. The methods used were spread plate method for total plate count (TPC) and membrane filter method for total coliform count (TCC), fecal coliform count (FCC), and fecal streptococcal count (FSC). pH meter was used for measuring pH.
One hundred percent of the tap water samples and 87.5 % of the bottled water samples were found to be contaminated with heterotrophic bacteria. Of the tap water samples, 55.3 % were positive for total coliforms, compared with 25 % of the bottled water. No bottled water samples were positive for fecal coliforms and fecal streptococci, in contrast to 21.1 % and 14.5 % of the tap water samples being contaminated with fecal coliforms and fecal streptococci, respectively. One hundred percent of the tap water samples and 54.2 % of the bottled water samples had pH in the acceptable range.
All of the municipal tap water samples and most of the bottled drinking water samples distributed in Dharan municipality were found to be contaminated with one or more than one type of indicator organisms. On the basis of our findings, we may conclude that comparatively, the bottled drinking water may have been safer (than tap water) to drink.
在尼泊尔等发展中国家,与水相关的疾病备受关注。每年,因饮用不安全饮用水导致无数发病和死亡案例。最近,瓶装饮用水的使用量有所增加,人们认为瓶装水比自来水更安全,饮用瓶装水有助于预防与水相关的疾病。因此,本研究的主要目的是分析瓶装饮用水和城市自来水的细菌学质量。
共分析了100个样本(76个自来水样本和24个瓶装水样本)的细菌学质量和pH值。采用的方法是平板计数法测定总菌数(TPC),膜过滤法测定总大肠菌群数(TCC)、粪大肠菌群数(FCC)和粪链球菌数(FSC)。使用pH计测量pH值。
发现100%的自来水样本和87.5%的瓶装水样本被异养细菌污染。在自来水样本中,55.3%的样本总大肠菌群呈阳性,而瓶装水样本的这一比例为25%。没有瓶装水样本粪大肠菌群和粪链球菌呈阳性,相比之下,分别有21.1%和14.5%的自来水样本被粪大肠菌群和粪链球菌污染。100%的自来水样本和54.2%的瓶装水样本pH值在可接受范围内。
发现在达兰市分发的所有城市自来水样本和大多数瓶装饮用水样本都被一种或多种指示生物污染。根据我们的研究结果,可以得出结论,相对而言,瓶装饮用水(比自来水)饮用起来可能更安全。