• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强奸迷思与伊利诺伊强奸态度接受量表在中国的跨文化适应

Rape Myths and the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale in China.

机构信息

1 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

2 Beijing Forestry University, BJ, China.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2019 Apr;34(7):1428-1460. doi: 10.1177/0886260516651315. Epub 2016 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1177/0886260516651315
PMID:27271981
Abstract

The study examines the similarities and differences between China and the United States with regard to rape myths. We assessed the individual level of rape myth acceptance among Chinese university students by adapting and translating a widely used measure of rape myth endorsement in the United States, the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance (IRMA) scale. We assessed whether the IRMA scale would be an appropriate assessment of attitudes toward rape among young adults in China. The sample consisted of 975 Chinese university students enrolled in seven Chinese universities. We used explorative factor analysis to examine the factor structure of the Chinese translation of the IRMA scale. Results suggest that the IRMA scale requires some modification to be employed with young adults in China. Our analyses indicate that 20 items should be deleted, and a five-factor model is generated. We discuss relevant similarities and differences in the factor structure and item loadings between the Chinese Rape Myth Acceptance (CRMA) and the IRMA scales. A revised version of the IRMA, the CRMA, can be used as a resource in rape prevention services and rape victim support services. Future research in China that employs CRMA will allow researchers to examine whether individual's response to rape myth acceptance can predict rape potential and judgments of victim blaming and community members' acceptance of marital rape.

摘要

本研究考察了中国和美国在强奸神话方面的相似和不同之处。我们通过改编和翻译美国广泛使用的强奸神话认可测量工具——伊利诺伊州强奸神话接受度量表(Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale,IRMA),评估了中国大学生个体层面的强奸神话接受度。我们评估了 IRMA 量表是否适合评估中国青年对强奸的态度。该样本由七所中国大学的 975 名中国大学生组成。我们使用探索性因素分析来检验 IRMA 量表中文翻译的因素结构。结果表明,IRMA 量表需要进行一些修改,才能在中国的年轻人中使用。我们的分析表明,应删除 20 个项目,并生成一个五因素模型。我们讨论了中国强奸神话接受度量表(CRMA)和 IRMA 量表在因素结构和项目负荷方面的相关相似和不同之处。修订后的 IRMA,即 CRMA,可以作为强奸预防服务和强奸受害者支持服务的资源。未来在中国进行的采用 CRMA 的研究将使研究人员能够检验个体对强奸神话接受度的反应是否可以预测强奸潜在风险以及对受害者指责和社区成员对婚内强奸的接受程度。

相似文献

1
Rape Myths and the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale in China.强奸迷思与伊利诺伊强奸态度接受量表在中国的跨文化适应
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Apr;34(7):1428-1460. doi: 10.1177/0886260516651315. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
2
Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States.性侵犯支持态度:美国两所大学的希腊裔和非希腊裔大学生中的强奸谬论接受和象征性抵制。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Nov;33(22):3502-3530. doi: 10.1177/0886260516636064. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
3
The Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale-Subtle Version: Using an Adapted Measure to Understand the Declining Rates of Rape Myth Acceptance.伊利诺伊州强奸谬论接受量表-微妙版:使用改编后的量表了解强奸谬论接受率的下降。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Oct;37(19-20):NP17807-NP17833. doi: 10.1177/08862605211030013. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
4
Male rape victim and perpetrator blaming.男性强奸受害者和加害者指责。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Jun;25(6):969-88. doi: 10.1177/0886260509340534. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
5
Rape myth acceptance among Korean college students: the roles of gender, attitudes toward women, and sexual double standard.韩国大学生对强奸的认知:性别、对女性的态度和性双重标准的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Jul;25(7):1200-23. doi: 10.1177/0886260509340536. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
6
National Comparisons of Rape Myth Acceptance Predictors Between Nonathletes and Athletes From Multi-Institutional Settings.多机构环境中非运动员和运动员的强奸谬论接受预测因子的国家比较。
Sex Abuse. 2019 Aug;31(5):543-559. doi: 10.1177/1079063217732790. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Male rape myths: the role of gender, violence, and sexism.男性强奸谬见:性别、暴力和性别歧视的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2008 May;23(5):600-15. doi: 10.1177/0886260507313529. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
8
Chinese University Students' Attitudes Toward Rape Myth Acceptance: The Role of Gender, Sexual Stereotypes, and Adversarial Sexual Beliefs.中国大学生对强奸谬见认同的态度:性别、性刻板印象及敌对性性观念的作用
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):2467-2486. doi: 10.1177/0886260520938507. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
9
Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism.考察男性强奸迷思接受度、女性强奸迷思接受度、对受害者的责备受、恐同、性别角色和矛盾性别歧视之间的关系。
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Sep;27(14):2807-23. doi: 10.1177/0886260512438281. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
10
Labeling Sexual Victimization Experiences: The Role of Sexism, Rape Myth Acceptance, and Tolerance for Sexual Harassment.标注性侵犯经历:性别歧视、强奸谬见认同及对性骚扰的容忍度所起的作用
Violence Vict. 2016;31(2):332-46. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00148. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the Vietnamese Rape Myths Acceptance Scales: A Web-Based Survey of Young Adults.越南强奸神话接受量表的编制:一项针对青年成年人的网络调查。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jul;53(7):2629-2652. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02893-7. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
2
Supportive Interventions of Chinese Police in Domestic Violence: Do Officer Knowledge and Training Matter?中国警察对家庭暴力的支持性干预措施:警官的知识和培训重要吗?
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug;39(15-16):3508-3542. doi: 10.1177/08862605241233266. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
3
Sexual Victimization in Adulthood and Associated Factors Among Men and Women: Cross-Sectional Evidence from Mainland China.
成年期的性侵害及男女相关因素:来自中国大陆的横断面证据
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):1001-1017. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02257-5. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
Migrant Women's Help-Seeking Decisions and Use of Support Resources for Intimate Partner Violence in China.中国流动妇女在亲密伴侣暴力问题上的求助决策与支持资源利用。
Violence Against Women. 2022 Jan;28(1):169-193. doi: 10.1177/10778012211000133. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
5
Predicting Bystander Intention to Intervene: The Role of Gender-Specific System Justification and Rape Myth Acceptance for Men and Women.预测旁观者的干预意图:特定性别的系统正当化以及男性和女性对强奸谬论的接受程度所起的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 13;11:326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00326. eCollection 2020.