Berger Sarah, Mahler Cornelia, Krug Katja, Szecsenyi Joachim, Schultz Jobst-Hendrik
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Heidelberg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Psychosomatik,Heidelberg, Germany.
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Apr 29;33(2):Doc22. doi: 10.3205/zma001021. eCollection 2016.
This project report describes the development, "piloting" and evaluation of an interprofessional seminar on team communication bringing together medical students and Interprofessional Health Care B.Sc. students at the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Germany.
A five-member interprofessional team collaborated together on this project. Kolb's experiential learning concept formed the theoretical foundation for the seminar, which explored three interprofessional competency areas: team work, communication and values/ethics. Evaluation for the purposes of quality assurance and future curricula development was conducted using two quantitative measures: descriptive analysis of a standardized course evaluation tool (EvaSys) ANOVA analysis of the German translation of the University of the West of England Interprofessional Questionnaire (UWE-IP-D).
The key finding from the standardized course evaluation was that the interprofessional seminars were rated more positively [M=2.11 (1 most positive and 5 most negative), SD=1, n=27] than the monoprofessional seminars [M=2.55, SD=0.98, n=90]. The key finding from the UWE-IP-D survey, comparing pre and post scores of the interprofessional (IP) (n=40) and monoprofessional (MP) groups (n=34), was that significant positive changes in mean scores for both groups towards communication, teamwork and interprofessional learning occurred.
Lessons learnt included: a) recognising the benefit of being pragmatic when introducing interprofessional education initiatives, which enabled various logistical and attitudinal barriers to be overcome; b) quantitative evaluation of learning outcomes alone could not explain positive responses or potential influences of interprofessional aspects, which highlighted the need for a mixed methods approach, including qualitative methods, to enrich judgment formation on interprofessional educational outcomes.
本项目报告描述了一个跨专业研讨会的开发、“试点”及评估情况,该研讨会汇聚了德国海德堡大学医学院的医学生和跨专业医疗保健理学学士学生。
一个由五名成员组成的跨专业团队共同开展了此项目。科尔布的体验式学习概念构成了研讨会的理论基础,该研讨会探讨了三个跨专业能力领域:团队合作、沟通以及价值观/伦理。为确保质量和未来课程开发进行了评估,采用了两种定量方法:对标准化课程评估工具(EvaSys)进行描述性分析,以及对西英格兰大学跨专业问卷(UWE - IP - D)的德译本进行方差分析。
标准化课程评估的主要发现是,跨专业研讨会的评分(M = 2.11,1表示最积极,5表示最消极,标准差 = 1,n = 27)比单一专业研讨会(M = 2.55,标准差 = 0.98,n = 90)更为积极。UWE - IP - D调查的主要发现是,比较跨专业(IP)组(n = 40)和单一专业(MP)组(n = 34)的前后得分,两组在沟通、团队合作和跨专业学习方面的平均得分均出现了显著的正向变化。
吸取的经验教训包括:a)认识到在引入跨专业教育举措时务实的好处,这有助于克服各种后勤和态度上的障碍;b)仅对学习成果进行定量评估无法解释跨专业方面的积极反应或潜在影响,这凸显了需要采用混合方法,包括定性方法,以丰富对跨专业教育成果的判断形成。