Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Instituto de Telecomunicações, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Endoscopy. 2016 Aug;48(8):723-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108435. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
Some studies suggest that narrow-band imaging (NBI) can be more accurate at diagnosing gastric intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia than white-light endoscopy (WLE) alone. We aimed to assess the real-time diagnostic validity of high resolution endoscopy with and without NBI in the diagnosis of gastric premalignant conditions and to derive a classification for endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM).
A multicenter prospective study (five centers: Portugal, Italy, Romania, UK, USA) was performed involving the systematic use of high resolution gastroscopes with image registry with and without NBI in a centralized informatics platform (available online). All users used the same NBI classification. Histologic result was considered the diagnostic gold standard.
A total of 238 patients and 1123 endoscopic biopsies were included. NBI globally increased diagnostic accuracy by 11 percentage points (NBI 94 % vs. WLE 83 %; P < 0.001) with no difference in the identification of Helicobacter pylori gastritis (73 % vs. 74 %). NBI increased sensitivity for the diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia significantly (87 % vs. 53 %; P < 0.001) and for the diagnosis of dysplasia (92 % vs. 74 %). The added benefit of NBI in terms of diagnostic accuracy was greater in OLGIM III/IV than in OLGIM I/II (25 percentage points vs. 15 percentage points, respectively; P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for EGGIM in the identification of extensive metaplasia was 0.98.
In a real-time scenario, NBI demonstrates a high concordance with gastric histology, superior to WLE. Diagnostic accuracy higher than 90 % suggests that routine use of NBI allows targeted instead of random biopsy samples. EGGIM also permits immediate grading of intestinal metaplasia without biopsies and merits further investigation.
一些研究表明,窄带成像(NBI)在诊断胃肠上皮化生和异型增生方面比白光内镜(WLE)更为准确。我们旨在评估高分辨率内镜联合和不联合 NBI 实时诊断胃前病变的诊断准确性,并为胃肠上皮化生的内镜分级(EGGIM)建立一个分类。
一项多中心前瞻性研究(五个中心:葡萄牙、意大利、罗马尼亚、英国、美国)在集中式信息平台(在线提供)中系统地使用高分辨率胃镜并结合和不结合 NBI 进行。所有使用者均使用相同的 NBI 分类。组织学结果被认为是诊断的金标准。
共纳入 238 例患者和 1123 例内镜活检。NBI 总体上提高了 11 个百分点的诊断准确性(NBI 94% vs. WLE 83%;P<0.001),但对幽门螺杆菌胃炎的识别无差异(73% vs. 74%)。NBI 显著提高了肠上皮化生的诊断敏感性(87% vs. 53%;P<0.001)和异型增生的诊断敏感性(92% vs. 74%)。在 OLGIM III/IV 中,NBI 在诊断准确性方面的额外获益大于在 OLGIM I/II 中(分别为 25 个百分点和 15 个百分点;P<0.001)。EGGIM 对广泛化生的识别的接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.98。
在实时环境下,NBI 与胃组织学具有高度一致性,优于 WLE。诊断准确性高于 90%表明,常规使用 NBI 可以允许针对而非随机活检样本。EGGIM 还可以在不进行活检的情况下立即对肠上皮化生进行分级,值得进一步研究。