Brereton Louise, Ingleton Christine, Gardiner Clare, Goyder Elizabeth, Mozygemba Kati, Lysdahl Kristin Bakke, Tummers Marcia, Sacchini Dario, Leppert Wojciech, Blaževičienė Aurelija, van der Wilt Gert Jan, Refolo Pietro, De Nicola Martina, Chilcott James, Oortwijn Wija
1 ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;31(2):181-192. doi: 10.1177/0269216316649154. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
Stakeholders are people with an interest in a topic. Internationally, stakeholder involvement in palliative care research and health technology assessment requires development. Stakeholder involvement adds value throughout research (from prioritising topics to disseminating findings). Philosophies and understandings about the best ways to involve stakeholders in research differ internationally. Stakeholder involvement took place in seven countries (England, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway and Poland). Findings informed a project that developed concepts and methods for health technology assessment and applied these to evaluate models of palliative care service delivery.
To report on stakeholder involvement in the INTEGRATE-HTA project and how issues identified informed project development.
Using stakeholder consultation or a qualitative research design, as appropriate locally, stakeholders in seven countries acted as 'advisors' to aid researchers' decision making. Thematic analysis was used to identify key issues across countries.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 132 stakeholders (82 professionals and 50 'lay' people) aged ⩾18 participated in individual face-to-face or telephone interviews, consultation meetings or focus groups.
Different stakeholder involvement methods were used successfully to identify key issues in palliative care. A total of 23 issues common to three or more countries informed decisions about the intervention and comparator of interest, sub questions and specific assessments within the health technology assessment.
Stakeholders, including patients and families undergoing palliative care, can inform project decision making using various involvement methods according to the local context. Researchers should consider local understandings about stakeholder involvement as views of appropriate and feasible methods vary. Methods for stakeholder involvement, especially consultation, need further development.
利益相关者是对某一主题感兴趣的人。在国际上,利益相关者参与姑息治疗研究和卫生技术评估仍有待发展。利益相关者的参与在整个研究过程中(从确定研究主题到传播研究结果)都具有重要价值。国际上对于让利益相关者参与研究的最佳方式的理念和理解各不相同。在七个国家(英国、德国、意大利、立陶宛、荷兰、挪威和波兰)开展了利益相关者参与活动。研究结果为一个项目提供了信息,该项目开发了卫生技术评估的概念和方法,并将其应用于评估姑息治疗服务提供模式。
报告利益相关者参与综合卫生技术评估(INTEGRATE-HTA)项目的情况,以及所确定的问题如何为项目发展提供信息。
根据当地情况,酌情采用利益相关者咨询或定性研究设计,七个国家的利益相关者充当“顾问”,以协助研究人员进行决策。采用主题分析法确定各国的关键问题。
背景/参与者:共有132名年龄在18岁及以上的利益相关者(82名专业人员和50名“非专业”人员)参与了个人面对面或电话访谈、咨询会议或焦点小组。
成功采用了不同的利益相关者参与方法来确定姑息治疗中的关键问题。三个或更多国家共有的23个问题为有关感兴趣的干预措施和对照、卫生技术评估中的子问题及具体评估的决策提供了依据。
利益相关者,包括接受姑息治疗的患者及其家属,可以根据当地情况采用各种参与方法为项目决策提供信息。研究人员应考虑当地对利益相关者参与的理解,因为对于适当和可行方法的看法各不相同。利益相关者参与方法,尤其是咨询方法,需要进一步发展。