Erdem Özcan, Van Lenthe Frank J, Prins Rick G, Voorham Toon A J J, Burdorf Alex
Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Municipality of Rotterdam, Department Research and Business Intelligence, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0157119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157119. eCollection 2016.
Various studies have reported socioeconomic inequalities in mental health among urban residents. This study aimed at investigating whether neighborhood social cohesion influences the associations between socio-economic factors and psychological distress.
Cross-sectional questionnaire study on a random sample of 18,173 residents aged 16 years and older from 211 neighborhoods in the four largest cities in the Netherlands. Psychological distress was the dependent variable (scale range 10-50). Neighborhood social cohesion was measured by five statements and aggregated to the neighborhood level using ecometrics methodology. Multilevel linear regression analyses were used to investigate cross-level interactions, adjusted for neighborhood deprivation, between individual characteristics and social cohesion with psychological distress.
The mean level of psychological distress among urban residents was 17.2. Recipients of disability, social assistance or unemployment benefits reported higher psychological distress (β = 5.6, 95%CI 5.2 to 5.9) than those in paid employment. Persons with some or great financial difficulties reported higher psychological distress (β = 3.4, 95%CI 3.2 to 3.6) than those with little or no financial problems. Socio-demographic factors were also associated with psychological distress, albeit with much lower influence. Living in a neighborhood with high social cohesion instead of low social cohesion was associated with a lower psychological distress of 22% among recipients of disability, social assistance or unemployment benefits and of 13% among citizens with financial difficulties.
Residing in socially cohesive neighborhoods may reduce the influence of lack of paid employment and financial difficulties on psychological distress among urban adults. Urban policies aimed at improving neighborhood social cohesion may contribute to decreasing socio-economic inequalities in mental health.
多项研究报告了城市居民心理健康方面的社会经济不平等现象。本研究旨在调查邻里社会凝聚力是否会影响社会经济因素与心理困扰之间的关联。
对荷兰四大城市211个社区中16岁及以上的18173名居民进行随机抽样的横断面问卷调查。心理困扰为因变量(量表范围10 - 50)。邻里社会凝聚力通过五项陈述进行测量,并使用生态计量方法汇总到邻里层面。采用多层次线性回归分析来研究个体特征与社会凝聚力与心理困扰之间的跨层次交互作用,并对邻里贫困进行了调整。
城市居民的心理困扰平均水平为17.2。领取残疾、社会救助或失业福利的人群报告的心理困扰程度(β = 5.6,95%置信区间5.2至5.9)高于有薪就业者。有一定或较大经济困难的人报告的心理困扰程度(β = 3.4,95%置信区间3.2至3.6)高于几乎没有或没有经济问题的人。社会人口学因素也与心理困扰有关,尽管影响程度要低得多。与社会凝聚力低的社区相比,生活在社会凝聚力高的社区中,领取残疾、社会救助或失业福利的人群心理困扰降低22%,有经济困难的公民心理困扰降低13%。
居住在社会凝聚力强的社区可能会减少无薪就业和经济困难对城市成年人心理困扰的影响。旨在提高邻里社会凝聚力的城市政策可能有助于减少心理健康方面的社会经济不平等现象。