Mamudu Lohuwa, Chiangong Jolyna, Curry Michael, McEligot Archana J, Mamudu Hadii M, Williams Faustine
Department of Public Health, College of Health and Human Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA.
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Affect Disord Rep. 2024 Jul;17. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100798. Epub 2024 May 3.
Nativity/birthplace and neighborhood cohesion are potential contributing factors to psychological distress. This study explores the impact of nativity/birthplace and neighborhood cohesion on moderate-severe psychological distress among United States (US) adults, considering the duration lived in a neighborhood.
Using the 2013-2018 National Health Interview Survey data, we conducted a stratified analysis based on years lived in the neighborhood (≤10 years [ = 96,175] and >10 years [ = 68,187]). Bivariate chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the statistical differences and associations between moderate-severe psychological distress and nativity/birthplace, and neighborhood cohesion, while adjusting for other covariates.
Individuals with 10 years or less of residence reported higher levels of moderate-severe psychological distress than those with more than 10 years (22.3 % vs. 18.1 %). Low or medium neighborhood cohesion, regardless of duration of residence, was associated with significantly higher odds of moderate-severe psychological distress compared to high cohesion. Foreign-born individuals had higher odds of psychological distress after more than 10 years in a neighborhood, although this difference was not statistically significant. However, they had lower odds of psychological distress after 10 years or less in the neighborhood compared to US-born individuals. Similarly, the interaction of foreign-born status and 10 years or less of residence in a neighborhood showed decreased odds of psychological distress.
These findings underscore the importance of strong social cohesion in neighborhoods for positive mental well-being. Establishing community initiatives to enhance neighborhood social cohesion is crucial.
出生地/出生地点和社区凝聚力是导致心理困扰的潜在因素。本研究探讨出生地/出生地点和社区凝聚力对美国成年人中重度心理困扰的影响,并考虑在社区居住的时长。
利用2013 - 2018年全国健康访谈调查数据,我们根据在社区居住的年限(≤10年[ = 96,175]和>10年[ = 68,187])进行了分层分析。采用双变量卡方检验和多变量逻辑回归模型来评估中重度心理困扰与出生地/出生地点以及社区凝聚力之间的统计学差异和关联,同时对其他协变量进行调整。
居住10年或以下的个体报告的中重度心理困扰水平高于居住超过10年的个体(22.3%对18.1%)。与高社区凝聚力相比,低或中等社区凝聚力,无论居住时长如何,都与中重度心理困扰的显著更高几率相关。在社区居住超过10年后,外国出生的个体出现心理困扰的几率更高,尽管这种差异在统计学上不显著。然而,与美国出生的个体相比,他们在社区居住10年或以下后出现心理困扰的几率更低。同样,外国出生身份与在社区居住10年或以下的相互作用显示心理困扰几率降低。
这些发现强调了社区强大的社会凝聚力对积极心理健康的重要性。开展社区倡议以增强社区社会凝聚力至关重要。