Li Shaojun, Guo Pengfei, Zou Qing, He Fuxiang, Xu Feng, Tan Liping
Department of Emergency, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0156960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156960. eCollection 2016.
This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of plastic wrap applied after birth and during NICU in preterm infants for prevention of heat loss in preterm infants.
The Medline (1950 to August 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 7, 2015), CINAHL (1982 to August 2015) and the Embase (1974 to August 2015) databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs with main outcomes related to the core temperature (baseline temperature and/or post-stabilization temperature), hypothermia, mortality rate and hyperthermia.
The included studies were of low to moderate quality. Compared with unwrapped infants, plastic wrap was associated with a significantly higher baseline temperature and post-stabilization temperature both in infants < 28 weeks of gestation (mean difference [MD] = 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.85; MD = 0.41, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.50, respectively), and in infants between 28 to 34 weeks of gestation (MD = 0.54, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.87; MD = 0.64, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.82, respectively). Use of plastic wrap was associated with lower incidence of hypothermia (relative risk [RR] = 0.70, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.78). However, use of plastic wrap in preterm infants was not associated with decrease in mortality (RR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.12, P = 0.31). Incidence of hyperthermia was significantly higher in the plastic wrap group as compared to that in the control group (RR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.56 to 4.15, P = 0.0002). Hyperthermia in the plastic wrap group was resolved within one or two hours after unwrapping the babies.
Plastic wrap can be considered an effective and safe additional intervention to prevent hypothermia in preterm infants. However, its cost-effectiveness and long-term effect on mortality needs to be ascertained by conducting well-designed studies with longer follow-up period.
本荟萃分析旨在研究出生后及在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)期间应用保鲜膜对早产儿预防体温过低的有效性和安全性。
检索了Medline(1950年至2015年8月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,2015年第7期)、CINAHL(1982年至2015年8月)和Embase(1974年至2015年8月)数据库,以查找与核心温度(基线温度和/或稳定后温度)、体温过低、死亡率和体温过高相关主要结局的随机对照试验(RCT)或半随机对照试验。
纳入的研究质量为低到中等。与未包裹的婴儿相比,保鲜膜在孕周<28周的婴儿(平均差[MD]=0.62,95%置信区间[CI]0.38至0.85;MD=0.41,95%CI0.33至0.50)以及孕周在28至34周的婴儿中(MD=0.54,95%CI0.21至0.87;MD=0.64,95%CI0.45至0.82)均与显著更高的基线温度和稳定后温度相关。使用保鲜膜与体温过低发生率较低相关(相对危险度[RR]=0.70,95%CI0.63至0.78)。然而,在早产儿中使用保鲜膜与死亡率降低无关(RR:0.88,95%CI0.70至1.12,P=0.31)。与对照组相比,保鲜膜组体温过高的发生率显著更高(RR=2.55,95%CI:1.56至4.15,P=0.0002)。保鲜膜组的体温过高在解开婴儿包裹后一两个小时内得到缓解。
保鲜膜可被视为预防早产儿体温过低的一种有效且安全的额外干预措施。然而,其成本效益以及对死亡率的长期影响需要通过开展设计良好且随访期更长的研究来确定。