Bundhun Pravesh Kumar, Janoo Girish, Chen Meng-Hua
Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P. R. China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(23):e3877. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003877.
From the year 1986 onwards, several studies have been published focusing on the comparison between fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, because antiplatelet and anticoagulating medications are used in approximation, before and during these procedures, bleeding events have been reported to be associated with both reperfusion therapies. This study aimed to compare the bleeding events associated with fibrinolytic therapy and primary angioplasty in patients with STEMI. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fibrinolysis and primary angioplasty in patients with STEMI were searched from Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases. Bleeding complications following 30 days from hospitalization were considered as the primary clinical endpoints in this study. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, re-infarction, stroke, and shock. Antiplatelet and anticoagulating drugs used during these 2 different procedures were compared. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3 software. Twelve studies involving 10 RCTs consisting of a total number of 5561 patients (2784 patients from the fibrinolysis group and 2777 patients from the PPCI group) were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed no significant difference in the overall bleeding complications during a 30-day period between these 2 reperfusion therapies with OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.17, P = 0.78. Nonintracranial bleeding was also not statistically significant with OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.04, P = 0.12. However, fibrinolytic therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of intracranial bleeding with OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.50, P = 0.001 than PPCI. In addition, death, re-infarction, and stroke significantly favored primary angioplasty. According to the results of this study, even if the rate of nonintracranial bleeding was not statistically significant between these 2 reperfusion therapies, fibrinolytic therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of intracranial bleeding than PPCI. In addition, PPCI was associated with a significantly lower rate of death, reinfarction, and stroke. Therefore, PPCI should be recommended in patients with STEMI, especially in PCI-capable hospitals.
自1986年起,已有多项研究发表,聚焦于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者纤溶治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的比较。然而,由于在这些治疗之前及治疗期间,抗血小板和抗凝药物的使用情况相近,据报道,两种再灌注治疗均会引发出血事件。本研究旨在比较STEMI患者纤溶治疗与直接血管成形术相关的出血事件。通过检索Medline、PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,查找比较STEMI患者纤溶治疗与直接血管成形术的随机对照试验(RCT)。本研究将住院30天后的出血并发症视为主要临床终点。次要终点包括全因死亡率、再梗死、中风和休克。比较这两种不同治疗过程中使用的抗血小板和抗凝药物。计算比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI),并使用RevMan 5.3软件进行汇总分析。本荟萃分析纳入了12项研究,其中包括10项RCT,共计5561例患者(纤溶治疗组2784例,PPCI组2777例)。我们的结果显示,这两种再灌注治疗在30天内的总体出血并发症无显著差异,OR为1.02;95%CI为0.89至1.17,P = 0.78。非颅内出血也无统计学意义,OR为0.85;95%CI为0.70至1.04,P = 0.12。然而,与PPCI相比,纤溶治疗的颅内出血发生率显著更高,OR为0.17;95%CI为0.06至0.50,P = 0.001。此外,死亡、再梗死和中风在直接血管成形术组更占优势。根据本研究结果,即使这两种再灌注治疗的非颅内出血发生率无统计学差异,但纤溶治疗的颅内出血发生率显著高于PPCI。此外,PPCI的死亡、再梗死和中风发生率显著更低。因此,对于STEMI患者,尤其是在具备PCI能力的医院,应推荐采用PPCI。