• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高管层的安全:首席执行官如何影响组织安全氛围和员工伤害。

Safety in the c-suite: How chief executive officers influence organizational safety climate and employee injuries.

机构信息

Faculty of Business Administration.

Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2016 Sep;101(9):1228-39. doi: 10.1037/apl0000116. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000116
PMID:27281188
Abstract

According to social learning theory, powerful and high status individuals can significantly influence the behaviors of others. In this paper, we propose that chief executive officers (CEOs) indirectly impact frontline injuries through the collective social learning experiences and effort of different groups of organizational actors-including members of the top management team (TMT), organizational supervisors, and frontline employees. We found support for our collective social learning model using data from 2,714 frontline employees, 1,398 supervisors, and 229 members of TMTs in 54 organizations. TMT members' experiences within a CEO-driven TMT safety climate was positively related to organizational supervisors' reports of the broader organizational safety climate and their subsequent collective support for safety (reported by frontline employees). In turn, supervisory support for safety was associated with fewer employee injuries at the individual level. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings for workplace safety research and practice. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

根据社会学习理论,有权力和地位高的个体可以显著影响他人的行为。在本文中,我们提出,首席执行官(CEO)通过不同群体的组织行为者的集体社会学习经验和努力,间接地影响一线员工的伤害情况,这些行为者包括高层管理团队(TMT)成员、组织主管和一线员工。我们使用来自 54 个组织的 2714 名一线员工、1398 名主管和 229 名 TMT 成员的数据,为我们的集体社会学习模型提供了支持。TMT 成员在 CEO 主导的 TMT 安全氛围中的经验与组织主管报告的更广泛的组织安全氛围以及他们随后对安全的集体支持(由一线员工报告)呈正相关。反过来,主管对安全的支持与个人层面上较少的员工伤害有关。我们讨论了这些发现对工作场所安全研究和实践的理论和实践意义。

相似文献

1
Safety in the c-suite: How chief executive officers influence organizational safety climate and employee injuries.高管层的安全:首席执行官如何影响组织安全氛围和员工伤害。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Sep;101(9):1228-39. doi: 10.1037/apl0000116. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
2
Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: does conscientiousness matter?敌对的工作环境、辱骂性的监督管理和员工应对策略:尽责性是否重要?
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jul;99(4):737-47. doi: 10.1037/a0035863. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
3
Supervisors' perceptions of organizational policies are associated with their likelihood to accommodate back-injured workers.主管对组织政策的认知与他们接纳背部受伤员工的可能性相关。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Feb;39(4):346-353. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1141245. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Civility norms, safety climate, and safety outcomes: a preliminary investigation.文明规范、安全氛围与安全成果:一项初步调查。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;19(4):437-52. doi: 10.1037/a0037110. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
5
The next generation of macroergonomics: integrating safety climate.下一代宏观工效学:整合安全氛围。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jul;68:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
6
How CEO Workaholism Influences Firm Performance: The Roles of Collective Organizational Engagement and TMT Power Distance.首席执行官工作狂如何影响公司绩效:集体组织敬业度和高层管理团队权力距离的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:725199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725199. eCollection 2021.
7
Doing the right thing without being told: joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance.无需他人指示便主动做事:主动氛围和一般自我效能感对员工主动客户服务绩效的联合影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 May;97(3):651-67. doi: 10.1037/a0026736. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
8
Evaluation of safety climate and employee injury rates in healthcare.医疗保健领域安全氛围与员工受伤率的评估
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep;73(9):595-9. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103218. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
9
A longitudinal study of an intervention to improve road safety climate: climate as an organizational boundary spanner.一项改善道路安全氛围干预措施的纵向研究:气候作为组织的边界推动者。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):216-26. doi: 10.1037/a0037613. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
10
Do similarities or differences between CEO leadership and organizational culture have a more positive effect on firm performance? A test of competing predictions.首席执行官领导风格和组织文化的相似性或差异性对企业绩效有更积极的影响吗?对相互竞争的预测的检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jun;101(6):846-61. doi: 10.1037/apl0000083. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing work safety behavior through supply chain safety management in small and medium sized manufacturing suppliers.通过中小型制造业供应商的供应链安全管理来加强工作安全行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73098-0.
2
Paradoxical leadership, team adaptation and team performance: The mediating role of inclusive climate.矛盾型领导、团队适应性与团队绩效:包容性氛围的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 6;14:1052732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052732. eCollection 2023.
3
Effects of Top Management Team Characteristics on Patent Strategic Change and Firm Performance.
高层管理团队特征对专利战略变革和企业绩效的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 11;12:762499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762499. eCollection 2021.
4
The effects of community safety support on COVID-19 event strength perception, risk perception, and health tourism intention: The moderating role of risk communication.社区安全支持对新冠疫情事件强度感知、风险感知及健康旅游意愿的影响:风险沟通的调节作用
MDE Manage Decis Econ. 2022 Mar;43(2):496-509. doi: 10.1002/mde.3397. Epub 2021 Jul 4.