O'Connor Richard J, Lewis M Jane, Adkison Sarah E, Bansal-Travers Maansi, Cummings K Michael
1 Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
2 Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Apr;44(2):222-226. doi: 10.1177/1090198116653935. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
In August 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warning letters to cigarette manufacturers promoting brands as "natural" or "additive-free" because of concerns that such marketing claims might mislead consumers into believing that these brands are less dangerous to smoke than others. The current study examined consumer beliefs about the relative harms of "natural" cigarettes, and whether these beliefs influenced perceptions of advertising and purchase intentions when participants were shown an advertisement for American Spirit cigarettes. Data were collected using a web-based survey conducted in 2013 among 3,006 U.S.-based web panel members aged 15 to 65 years. Ratings of "natural" cigarette health risks (i.e., misperceptions) differed by sex, race, education, smoking status, and age. Controlling for perceived risks of other cigarette types, never smokers ( B = -0.31, p < .001) and ever/former smokers ( B = -0.15, p = .002) had significantly fewer misperceptions of "natural" cigarettes than current smokers. Current smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 17.8), believing the ad was truthful (OR = 1.18), and having more misperceptions about "natural" cigarette health risks (OR = 1.13) were independently associated with greater purchase intention. Consumers perceived cigarettes marketed as "natural" or "additive-free" as less harmful, and this influenced their perceptions of advertising claims and intention to purchase, controlling for other factors. These findings underscore Food and Drug Administration's recent warning letters.
2015年8月,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)向香烟制造商发出警告信,原因是这些制造商将某些品牌宣传为“天然”或“无添加剂”,FDA担心此类营销宣传可能会误导消费者,使其认为这些品牌的香烟比其他品牌危害更小。本研究调查了消费者对“天然”香烟相对危害的看法,以及当参与者观看美国精神香烟的广告时,这些看法是否会影响他们对广告的认知以及购买意愿。数据收集采用了2013年进行的一项基于网络的调查,调查对象为3006名年龄在15至65岁之间的美国网络小组成员。对“天然”香烟健康风险的评级(即错误认知)因性别、种族、教育程度、吸烟状况和年龄而有所不同。在控制了对其他类型香烟的感知风险后,从不吸烟者(B = -0.31,p <.001)和曾经/以前吸烟者(B = -0.15,p =.002)对“天然”香烟的错误认知明显少于当前吸烟者。当前吸烟(优势比[OR] = 17.8)、认为广告真实(OR = 1.18)以及对“天然”香烟健康风险有更多错误认知(OR = 1.13)与更高的购买意愿独立相关。在控制其他因素的情况下,消费者认为被宣传为“天然”或“无添加剂”的香烟危害较小,这影响了他们对广告宣传的认知和购买意愿。这些发现强调了美国食品药品监督管理局最近发出的警告信。