Suppr超能文献

美国精神烟包描述与危害认知:改良烟包的众包比较

American Spirit Pack Descriptors and Perceptions of Harm: A Crowdsourced Comparison of Modified Packs.

作者信息

Pearson Jennifer L, Richardson Amanda, Feirman Shari P, Villanti Andrea C, Cantrell Jennifer, Cohn Amy, Tacelosky Michael, Kirchner Thomas R

机构信息

The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD;

The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC;

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Aug;18(8):1749-56. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw097. Epub 2016 May 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2015, the Food and Drug Administration issued warnings to three tobacco manufacturers who label their cigarettes as "additive-free" and/or "natural" on the grounds that they make unauthorized reduced risk claims. The goal of this study was to examine US adults' perceptions of three American Spirit (AS) pack descriptors ("Made with Organic Tobacco," "100% Additive-Free," and "100% US Grown Tobacco") to assess if they communicate reduced risk.

METHODS

In September 2012, three cross-sectional surveys were posted on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Adult participants evaluated the relative harm of a Marlboro Red pack versus three different AS packs with the descriptors "Made with Organic Tobacco," "100% Additive-Free," or "100% US Grown Tobacco" (Survey 1; n = 461); a Marlboro Red pack versus these AS packs modified to exclude descriptors (Survey 2; n = 857); and unmodified versus modified AS pack images (Survey 3; n = 1001).

RESULTS

The majority of Survey 1 participants rated the unmodified AS packs as less harmful than the Marlboro Red pack; 35.4%-58.8% of Survey 2 participants also rated the modified (no claims) packs as less harmful than Marlboro Red. In these surveys, prior use of AS cigarettes was associated with reduced perceptions of risk (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.59-2.40). "Made with Organic Tobacco" and "100% Additive-Free" were associated with reduced perceptions of risk when comparing the modified versus the unmodified AS packs (Survey 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggest that these AS pack descriptors communicate reduced harm messages to consumers. Findings have implications for regulatory actions related to product labeling and packaging.

IMPLICATIONS

These findings provide additional evidence that the "Made with Organic Tobacco," "100% Additive-Free," and "100% US Grown" descriptors, as well as other aspects of the AS pack design, communicate reduced harm to non-, current, and former smokers. Additionally, they provide support for the importance of FDA's 2015 warning to Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company on "100% Additive Free" as an unauthorized modified risk claim.

摘要

引言

2015年,美国食品药品监督管理局(Food and Drug Administration)向三家烟草制造商发出警告,因其将香烟标注为“无添加剂”和/或“天然”,理由是它们做出了未经授权的降低风险声明。本研究的目的是调查美国成年人对美国精神(American Spirit,AS)香烟包装上的三种描述语(“采用有机烟草制成”、“100%无添加剂”和“100%美国种植烟草”)的看法,以评估这些描述语是否传达了降低风险的信息。

方法

2012年9月,在亚马逊土耳其机器人(Amazon Mechanical Turk)上发布了三项横断面调查。成年参与者评估了万宝路红烟(Marlboro Red)与带有“采用有机烟草制成”、“100%无添加剂”或“100%美国种植烟草”描述语的三种不同AS香烟的相对危害(调查1;n = 461);万宝路红烟与去掉描述语的这些AS香烟的相对危害(调查2;n = 857);以及未修改的与修改后的AS香烟包装图片的相对危害(调查3;n = 1001)。

结果

调查1中的大多数参与者认为未修改的AS香烟比万宝路红烟危害小;调查2中35.4%-58.8%的参与者也认为去掉描述语后的AS香烟比万宝路红烟危害小。在这些调查中,之前使用过AS香烟与较低的风险认知相关(调整后的优势比[AOR]为1.59-2.40)。在比较修改后的与未修改的AS香烟包装时,“采用有机烟草制成

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验