Suppr超能文献

一种基于模型的方法来确定巴西家庭粮食不安全测量量表的类别及相应临界值。

A Model-Based Approach to Identify Classes and Respective Cutoffs of the Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale.

作者信息

Reichenheim Michael E, Interlenghi Gabriela S, Moraes Claudia L, Segall-Corrêa Ana M, Pérez-Escamilla Rafael, Salles-Costa Rosana

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;

Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Brazil and Family Health Program, Estácio de Sá University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;

出版信息

J Nutr. 2016 Jul;146(7):1356-64. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.231845. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale (EBIA) is the main tool for assessing household food insecurity (FI) in Brazil, assisting in monitoring and improving national public policies to promote food security. Based on the sum of item scores, households have been classified into 4 levels of FI, with the use of cutoffs arising from expert discussions informed by psychometric analyses and policy considerations.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify homogeneous latent groups corresponding to levels of FI, examine whether such subgroups could be defined from discriminant cutoffs applied to the overall EBIA raw score, and compare these cutoffs against those currently used.

METHODS

A cross-sectional population-based study with a representative sample of 1105 households from a low-income metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro was conducted. Latent class factor analysis (LCFA) models were applied to the answers to EBIA's items to identify homogeneous groups, obtaining the number of latent classes for FI measured by the scale. Based on this and a thorough classification agreement evaluation, optimal cutoffs for discriminating between different severity levels of FI were ascertained. Model-based grouping and the official EBIA classification cutoffs were also contrasted.

RESULTS

LCFA identified 4 homogeneous groups with a very high degree of class separation (entropy = 0.906), endorsing the classification of EBIA as a 4-level measure of FI. Two sets of cutoffs were identified to separate such groups according to household type: 1/2, 5/6, and 10/11 in households with children and adolescents (score range: 0-14); and 1/2, 3/4, and 5/6 in adult-only households (score range: 0-7).

CONCLUSION

Although roughly classifying EBIA as in previous studies, the current approach suggests that, in terms of raw score, households endorsing only one item of the scale would be better classified by being placed in the same stratum as those remaining negative on all items.

摘要

背景

巴西家庭粮食不安全度量表(EBIA)是巴西评估家庭粮食不安全状况的主要工具,有助于监测和改进促进粮食安全的国家公共政策。根据各项目得分总和,家庭被分为4个粮食不安全级别,其划分界限是通过心理测量分析和政策考量得出的专家讨论确定的。

目的

本研究旨在识别与粮食不安全级别相对应的同质潜在群体,检验是否可从应用于EBIA总分的判别界限来定义此类亚组,并将这些界限与当前使用的界限进行比较。

方法

对里约热内卢一个低收入大都市区的1105户家庭进行了具有代表性的横断面人群研究。将潜在类别因子分析(LCFA)模型应用于EBIA各项目的答案,以识别同质群体,得出该量表所测量的粮食不安全潜在类别的数量。基于此及全面的分类一致性评估,确定区分不同严重程度粮食不安全的最佳界限。还对比了基于模型的分组和EBIA官方分类界限。

结果

LCFA识别出4个具有高度类别区分度的同质群体(熵 = 0.906),支持将EBIA分类为4级粮食不安全度量方法。根据家庭类型确定了两组界限来区分这些群体:有儿童和青少年的家庭为1/2、5/6和10/11(得分范围:0 - 14);只有成年人的家庭为1/2、3/4和5/6(得分范围:0 - 7)。

结论

尽管当前方法与以往研究大致对EBIA进行了分类,但表明就原始得分而言,仅认可量表一项内容的家庭与所有项目均为否定回答的家庭归为同一阶层会得到更好的分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验